Today I've been told that C is memory safe if you're just very neat, that code is documentation, and that expecting protocol specs is a form of bias?

I didn't realize it was 90s week; I'll go get a flannel.

@dymaxion that whole exchange is some yikes
@luis_in_brief
Honestly I shouldn't have wasted the time

@dymaxion @luis_in_brief

I went and found the exchange.

I don't understand when people who should be / are trying to be serious intellectually ignore facts dropped right in front of them.

I've never heard of Dat before, haven't researched it, but am now convinced that it should never be used. Anything with that much blind cult is compromised IMHO.

@johntimaeus meh, pretty much any software of any userbase size has at least some under-informed cult-y users. (I hope this dude is only a user!) But yeah, they don’t need to have wasted @dymaxion ‘s time.

@dymaxion

C is completely memory safe so long as you stick to defined behavior. 🤔

@dymaxion expecting protocol specs is a form of bias? I mean, yeah, it's a strong bias towards correctness...
@dymaxion Oh wow, I missed the entire debacle because I already had the guy (of course it's a guy) blocked

@dymaxion
The same way that nuclear weapons are safe? When not used? \s

Edit: I've found the thread… I regret knowing the concept of “user-driven fuzzing”.

@dymaxion "Code is documentation"! 😄😄😄
@dymaxion reading the first half I was composing a 90s joke already...
@dymaxion the 90s internet had the best possible security model; no one knew it was there. Then Tim started ruining it.