#SCOTUS rules the #PostalService can't be sued, even when #mail is intentionally not delivered

A divided Supreme Court Tues ruled citizens can’t sue the #USPS, even when employees deliberately refuse to deliver mail.

By a 5-4 vote, the justices ruled against a Texas landlord, Lebene Konan, who alleges her mail was intentionally withheld for 2 years. Konan, who is #Black, claims racial #prejudice played a role in postal employees’ actions.

#law #racism #discrimination
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-postal-service-missing-mail-7ce97a5b7d56373cdeaa6ecc9a9132f5?utm_source=onesignal&utm_medium=push&utm_campaign=2026-02-24-Supreme+Court

Supreme Court says US Postal Service can't be sued

A divided Supreme Court has ruled that Americans can’t sue the U.S. Postal Service, even when employees deliberately refuse to deliver mail. By a 5-4 vote Tuesday, the justices ruled against Texas landlord Lebene Konan, who alleges her mail was intentionally withheld for two years. Konan is Black and claims racial prejudice played a role in postal employees’ actions. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in his majority opinions the federal law that generally shields the Postal Service from lawsuits over missing, lost and undelivered mail includes “the intentional nondelivery of mail.” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in dissent the immunity doesn't apply to situations when the decision not to deliver mail “was driven by malicious reasons.”

AP News

Justice #ClarenceThomas, writing for the 5 conservative justices, said the federal #law that generally shields the #PostalService from lawsuits over missing, lost & undelivered #mail includes “the intentional nondelivery of mail.”

In dissent, Justice Sonia #Sotomayor wrote that while the protection against lawsuits is broad, it does not extend to situations when the decision not to deliver mail “was driven by #malicious reasons.” Justice Neil #Gorsuch joined his 3 liberal colleagues in dissent.

@Nonilex
This basically tells you you cannot, under any circumstances, put your 2026 midterm ballot in the mail.
@Nonilex
WTAF?!?!? So no mail in ballots will be secured for the 2026 midterms. This is a blatant election sabotage tactic by this vile criminal court. What can we do? Not vote by mail? What about certified mail? What if that isn't delivered? You know, legal documents etc.? How can anyone use the Post Office any longer? That's probably just what they want.
@Nonilex
OK SCOTUS assholes, how the hell are they supposed to get their mail? USPS can just pick who to not deliver to and then...?

@notthatkindofdoctor

SCOTUS isn't in charge of the USPS. This is a matter of law, specifically statutes passed by Congress.

Congress wrote a law saying USPS can't be sued for this stuff. If you have a question about that, well, ask congresspeople how they expect that to work out.

@Nonilex

@Nonilex

Hahaha, they are letting you know they are going to cheat by messing with the "voting by mail" system, so if anyone needed ANY MORE evidence or proof to believe that then....

@Nonilex Of course they'd rule that this part of the government is exempt from lawsuits. Oh and this one now, and that one, and this one over here......

@violenteastcoastcity

Congress passed the law against such suits a long time ago...

@Nonilex

For some reason, the junk mail always gets delivered.

@Nonilex Getting this precedent ahead of midterms was probably pretty important since they can now intentionally fuck up ballots without repercussions.

@Nonilex
@dyckron

"even when employees deliberately refuse to deliver mail."

🤔

"*specifically* when employees deliberately refuse to deliver mail" might be the more correct interpretation...??

🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️