A big shout-out to the @toulousehacking Review Committee. I submitted two talks, and one was accepted. Both talks were reviewed by three reviewers, and I received their comments along with the decision (Accepted/Rejected).

This is so valuable! Even though one of the talks was accepted, I can read the concerns (too deep for the time, too little time for the introduction, etc.) and, above all, the feedback on the talk that was not accepted. The feedback helps me refine the abstract for another CFP round and improve the talk in general.

This feedback will certainly also help less experienced speakers understand the review committee's decision. Hopefully, this will help mitigate some of the negative feelings that a rejection can trigger.

So once again: very cool! Keep up the good work :)