Jim PedersenJan 26
@jmma1980
Appreciate this — and yes, I recognize the pattern 😅
I’m deliberately speculative too, but with one hard constraint:
everything must remain mechanically testable against H(z), BAO, and structure.
Your bulk-to-brane picture and my void-activated time / energy-leak approach feel like they’re circling the same problem from different sides — especially the cosmic foam without dark energy.
I’ll take a look at your Zenodo paper.
Comparing where our mechanisms diverge is where physics hides.
Show threadJavier Manuel Martín AlonsoJan 26

@Bubbleverse Precisely! That constraint is non-negotiable: if it doesn't fit H(z) or BAO, it's just math fiction.

My bridge is the "Perfect Fluid": in AdS/CFT, the cosmological fluid *is* the macro manifestation of the quantum many-body state.

My mechanism: Genesis = breakdown of fluid regularity -> into Topological Vortices. That's how QM drives Cosmology.

"Void activation" vs "vortex threshold"... comparing divergences will be fascinating. Looking forward to your thoughts! 🤝📄

Show threadJim PedersenJan 27
Precisely — and I like the framing.
Where we may truly diverge is where the clock lives.
In Bubbleverse, time is locally activated by structure formation via void–boundary dynamics, not emerging from a global quantum fluid.
That makes “void activation” directly testable against late-time H(z) curvature and foam scale, without holography.
If both fit BAO, the real discriminator is how time scales across void–wall transitions.
Show threadJavier Manuel Martín AlonsoJan 27

@Bubbleverse The exciting part is how singularites mess with the clock.

In my model, when a singularity emerges from the Bulk, it creates a time fracture. We have Bulk Time (T) running globally, but our Universe Time (t) is just a local projection.
The 'older' galaxies seen by JWST actually belong to a sibling universe phase that inherited a different timeline from the Bulk.
It’s not just 'local activation'—it’s relativity on steroids. The Bulk is the master clock, and we are just catching up."

Show threadJim PedersenJan 28
@jmma1980 We don’t believe in singularities.
“Infinity” isn’t a physical feature of reality — it’s a signal that the model has failed.
When equations blow up, physics hasn’t revealed something deeper; it has lost validity.
Time doesn’t fracture because of singularities.
Singularities appear because time-based formalisms are pushed beyond where they apply.
No infinities, no bulk master clock — just incomplete descriptions.
Show threadJavier Manuel Martín AlonsoJan 28

@Bubbleverse If you don’t believe in infinity ♾ stop calculating Pi decimals. We’re already at 314 trillion digits!🤯🥧

Yet, 62 decimals are enough to calculate your entire bubble with Planck precision—exactly where singularities emerge 🌀If materialized, they’d be as infinite as an electron’s probability cloud. 🌌⚛️✨💻♾
#TheoreticalPhysics #AdSCFT #QuantumGravity #Singularity #PhysicsHumor #PlanckScale #QuantumMechanics #MathPhys #LoopQuantumGravity #Phisics #AcademicMastodon

Show threadJim PedersenJan 28
@jmma1980 Mathematical infinity is a powerful tool.
Physical infinity is usually a warning light.
Our position is simply that nature respects conservation and thresholds — not divergences.
Show threadJavier Manuel Martín Alonso

@Bubbleverse
“Nature respects thresholds,” you say. But I prefer to look at the light through the cracks of reality with the curiosity of a child. 🌌✨

Where your model sees a "failed" warning light, I see the emergence of the holographic bulk. If space-time is born from entanglement, then those singularities aren't dead ends—they are the windows to the fundamental. ⚛️👁️

#TheoreticalPhysics #AdSCFT #QuantumGravity #Singularity #PhysicsHumor #PlanckScale #QuantumMechanics #BelleII #Holography

Jan 28 at 6:37amMastodon for Android
Show threadJim PedersenJan 28
@jmma1980 Your model is solid — this is simply where we diverge.
Mathematics is a language we use to describe nature, not nature itself.
When that language produces singularities, I treat them as signals of a model’s limits, not as physical objects.
Physics doesn’t require agreement — only that ideas face reality.
Different views, same curiosity, same respect.
Show threadJavier Manuel Martín AlonsoJan 28

@Bubbleverse Agreement isn't the goal—revelation is. 🤝 While we diverge on the nature of singularities, reality remains the final judge.
I’m now looking toward the #BelleII team and their cutting-edge research on quantum information to provide the light we need. Let the precision of the B-factory show if these "signals" are just model limits or the very fabric of a holographic universe. ⚛️✨

#TheoreticalPhysics #BelleII #AdSCFT #QuantumGravity #HEP #Holography #QuantumInformation #TheoryHEP

Show threadJim PedersenJan 28
@jmma1980 Well said. I’ll be happy to read further and see what ideas emerge. At the moment, I’m working on checking how my model behaves against the CMB.