We are opening an investigation into Grok because we believe that X may have breached the DSA.

We have seen over the last weeks and months antisemitic content, non-consensual deepfakes of women, and child sexual abuse material.

In Europe, no company will make money by violating our fundamental rights.

More: https://link.europa.eu/Fh8h84

@EUCommission just ban X, enforce Mastodon.
@EUCommission you remain big hypocrites:
@hub people haven't started to use X/Grok on @EUCommission people and their families, that'd be an wake up call...
@hub @EUCommission Twitter is the best place to share this article, though
@mkljczk @hub @EUCommission True, though where is the link to "Share on Mastodon" ? How about showing the path to alternatives...
@AverageJoe @hub @EUCommission i'd focus on Mastodon being listed at the end of the 'Follow us on' list instead. you don't learn of new platforms by clicking on a 'share' button.

@hub @EUCommission
It gives the impression they don't have smart people on board, and don't know anything about tech.

It's so frustrating the harm they continue to do.

@EUCommission Antisematic and islamaphobia. Do not forget. Both are horrible and should be punished/eradicated.
@EUCommission great initiative. Hold them accountable! 👊🏼
@EUCommission unautorisierte Übertragung aus dem Englischen:
"Wir eröffnen eine Untersuchung gegen Grok, weil wir glauben, dass X gegen den DSA [Digital Services Act] verstoßen haben könnte.
Wir haben in den letzten Wochen und Monaten antisemitische Inhalte, nicht einvernehmliche Deepfakes von Frauen und Material zum sexuellen Missbrauch von Kindern gesehen.
In Europa wird kein Unternehmen Geld verdienen, indem es unsere Grundrechte verletzt."

@EUCommission

As usual, you are posting such big-mouthed rants against #X and #Grok exclusively here on the #Fediverse, but keep your mouth shut on your X account.

You're just pathetic cowards, fooling no one anymore.

@petrikas

LOL.

#Fediverse: "We are opening an investigation into Grok because we believe that X may have breached the DSA.

We have seen over the last weeks and months antisemitic content, non-consensual deepfakes of women, and child sexual abuse material.

In Europe, no company will make money by violating our fundamental rights." (emphasis added)

#X (17 mins ago): "We have launched a new formal investigation against X under the Digital Services Act (DSA).

It will assess whether the company properly assessed and mitigated risks associated with the deployment of Grok's functionalities into X in the EU." (emphasis added)

@EUCommission

@petrikas

You can post risk-free links by using xcancel.com, e.g., in this case:

https://xcancel.com/EU_Commission/status/2015780627178565985#m

@katzenberger If I open that in a private session, it still loads up the comments (also, that's exactly the link I shared)

@petrikas

Ooops, I see. I'm using a browser plugin that replaces links in the background, so I didn't realize you were already using it – sorry.

Not sure what you meant by "still loads up the comments"? What am I missing? [In case you meant the tone of the replies: fair point]

@katzenberger I think there's a setting in xcancel specifically to hide the reply tweets. But it isn't ticked by default.

So opening an xcancel link in a fresh session will still load the replies, as far as I managed to figure out.

@petrikas

True. Didn't realize that you meant the tone of the replies. I get why you prefer to use a CW, although personally I only use them if my own post or the tile of the link contains something I would not want to be featured here.

@katzenberger Well, X has no moderation. At any point in time a reply might appear... I'd rather my followers (or anyone) not click the link.

@EUCommission Thus spoke the EU Commission, whilst and at the same time stubbornly keeping putting its own data and processes in the greedy hands of another equally dismal company, against the expressed concerns and directives from the EU parliament.

Walk the walk. Don’t just talk the talk.

@EUCommission Stop posting on them then. Stop using them then. You and everyone else in European institutions. Social media companies are making money through the ads that are being displayed next to the content posted by regular users. No posts from regular users means less ads displayed, which in turn means less money for them.

@EUCommission

Vielleicht könnte sich die EU-Kommission angesichts der Verfehlungen auch dazu durchringen, auf X als Nachrichten-Medium zu verzichten. Es fühlt sich so ähnlich an, als würde die EU-Kommission wegen der Reichweite in Compact inserieren.

#unplugmusk
#unplugtrump
#unplugx

@haraldrieder @EUCommission

Das würde zumindest gut zur Resolution in Sachen digitale Souveränität passen.

https://www.br.de/nachrichten/netzwelt/eu-parlament-grosse-mehrheit-fuer-digitale-souveraenitaet

EU-Parlament: Große Mehrheit stimmt für digitale Souveränität

Fraktionsübergreifend hat das EU-Parlament eine Resolution angenommen, die gegen digitale Abhängigkeit von Technologiekonzernen wirken will. EU-Kommission und Mitgliedsländer werden zu einer Bestandsaufnahme und konkreten Gegenmaßnahmen aufgefordert.

BR24
@EUCommission
Nunrersuchungen sind ja ganz notwendig , Besser wäre es aber:Keine Kostenplichtigen Accounts mehr, keine relevanten Werbungen, Keinewichtigen Teilnehmer mehr auf dieser Dreckschleuder X.
Es gibt gute Europäische Alternativen!!!
@EUCommission I'll believe it once I see it. As of now you're actively funding X by having a presence there - and posting regularly - hence directing ad income their way.
@hambier Well, there's a tradeoff between not funding X and not passing the message to all who are only on X. I think the EU presence here is a good start.
@OndrejZizka At this point I'm not sure who is even left on X besides politicians (because my journalist audience is there!) and journalists (because politicians are there!) and [insert namecalling].

@EUCommission Then stop taking money from the lobby groups, stop deregulation, start holding them accountable. 155 Million Euros in lobby money in 2025 divided between 733 lobby groups, the biggest spenders are the usual suspects.

All our data go to US tech corporations for whatever purposes while we in turn get the right-wing propaganda by the big players who are all firmly behind Trump whose goal it is to destroy NATO and the EU. What could go wrong, right?

https://corporateeurope.org/en/2025/10/big-tech-lobby-budgets-hit-record-levels

Big Tech lobby budgets hit record levels | Corporate Europe Observatory

New figures show that the digital industry as a whole is now spending €151 million a year on lobbying the EU, a major increase to what was already considerable firepower.

Corporate Europe Observatory

@EUCommission "In Europe, no company will make money by violating our fundamental rights."

Great news!! So, you are going to take down petrochemical industries that attack our fundamental right to a good health, for example? 😀

@EUCommission Sounds good, but I think I'd be more inclined to believe you were serious about it if you didn't still have an active Twitter account.

@EUCommission

no company will make money by violating our fundamental rights.

Shouldn't anyone who tries then be suspended until the end of the investigation? Or is not damaging their revenue more important than not harming citizen rights?

@EUCommission awesome! do you have the means to block grok until the investigations are over? 
@EUCommission ban X from the EU as soon as possible. Be independent and create a path for a different technology in the EU.
@EUCommission The best time to leave X was when Elon Musk bought twitter. The second best time to leave X is today.
@EUCommission just leave X altogether
@EUCommission So you're starting by closing all your accounts on X, right?
@BartV @EUCommission That would be a good start. And while you're at it, start a campaign to stimulate the usage of distributed social media like Mastodon.
@EUCommission it would be cool if they had to pay per violation, and not just once

@EUCommission
Good and frankly long overdue step.

Furthermore, as others have already mentioned, withdrawing from that platform would also be a correct step. Yes, it's a bit different from the position of institution since you need to reach people somehow (kind of like journalists need to stick to even some nasty spaces) however:

A) That corner of space should be under YOUR control. Basically what you're doing with Mastodon presence is the way to go. Your instance, your infrastructure, without reliance on external actors, especially now

B) It must COMPLEMENT the official channels, not replace them. Your social outreach must not become what the US institutions (and I use the term loosely) are doing.

So yes, you're walking in the right direction and there's still room for growth.
Also, probably the most important thing: Social media must be "people first" not "engagement first".

@EUCommission Ok. BUT leave X now. You already have an own instance and a vicepresident in mastodon @HennaVirkkunen . Just follow the leader. You are working for the enemy everytime you post on X.
@EUCommission I think is a wonderful opportunity for a system to keep reminding you until this is fixed…
@EUCommission But you still use it. Maybe it's time to opt out.
@EUCommission - Absolutely 100%. Kick Musk where it hurts the most. His WALLET or is it His MURSE "man's purse".
@EUCommission ban X from the EU, enforce other social networks. That's the only way to hold them accountable.
@EUCommission Could you clarify what do you mean with "antisemitic content"? Many organizations turning to neo-fascism use that as an umbrella term to censor, for example, the human rights and the self-determination of the Palestinian people.
@EUCommission Why is there a "may" in that post?
@EUCommission the path is 100% correct, now do even more
@EUCommission Interesting. The question of the investigation is raised every day, but it's by no means possible to consider the right answer to the end.