@GrapheneOS @LaQuadrature @mullvadnet
@protonprivacy @ivpn @divested @archlinux @fedora @Androidauth l @signalapp @Mer__edith @mollyim @simplex @kuketzblog
@secureblue.dev @tommytran732
@josh

Source : https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/cache/media_attachments/files/115/605/731/824/838/249/original/3338dd7fb08f5e2c.png

https://archive.is/UrlvK

https://mamot.fr/@LaQuadrature/115581775965025042

GrapheneOS is being heavily targeted by the French state because we provide highly secure devices and won't include backdoors for law enforcement access. They're conflating us with companies selling closed source products using portions of our code.

Both French state media and corporate media are publishing many stories attacking the GrapheneOS project based on false and unsubstantiated claims from French law enforcement.

They've made a clear threat to seize our servers and arrest our developers if we do not cooperate by adding backdoors. Due to this, we're leaving France and leaving French service providers including OVH. We need substantial help from the community to push back against this across platforms.

People malicious towards us are also using it as an opportunity to spread libel/harassment content targeting our team, raid our chat rooms and much more. /e/ and iodéOS are both based in France, and are both actively attacking GrapheneOS. /e/ receives substantial government funding. Both are extremely non-private and insecure which is why France is targeting us while those get government funding.

We need a lot more help than usual and we're sending our the first ever notification to everyone on the server because this is a particularly bad situation. If people help us, it will enable us to focus more on development again including releasing experimental Pixel 10 releases very soon.

#grapheneos #privacy #security #nobackdoors #fightchatcontrol #foss

Do you have sources on #iodeOS and #eOS attacking GrapheneOS?

As well as then getting government funding?

@Rhababerbarbar /e/ and iodé are scams, the scammer Gael Duval is the founder of Murena behind /e/, and Robert Braxman is another scammer who supports iodéOS and uses it for his completely defective Braxphone devices with backdoors. Both operating systems deceive users, and the people behind these projects attacked GrapheneOS by spreading misinformation and harassing content against the project and the team, lying to people who might be interested in GrapheneOS by falsely claiming that GrapheneOS is too difficult to use, that the apps doesn't work properly unless you hack the phone, that the community is a cult with a bunch of psychopaths, and that the founder is completely insane. You can find these insults in discussion threads on Lemmy, Reddit, Mastodon, and Hacker News. I have read them myself, and if I can find the links, because I didn't save them (I didn't see the point in saving threatening messages from scammers in my favorites), I will publish them.

The LineageOS community warned about the extremely shady nature of /e/ long before GrapheneOS, back when the project was still known as CopperheadOS. This blog was written by a developer who worked on LineageOS. There are other discussions on this topic on Reddit and Hacker News.

https://ewwlo.void.partidopirata.com.ar/

Here are a series of serious problems with /e/

https://community.e.foundation/t/service-announcement-26-may/41252/10

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/24134-devices-lacking-standard-privacysecurity-patches-and-protections-arent-private

And Gael Duval has always ignored the problems and pretended they don't exist, for example :

https://infosec.exchange/@gael@mastodon.social/115581708665123314

You will find other links on my page from Divested, and there are also sources from security researcher Mike Kuketz.

But as a member of the GrapheneOS community, you should already know all this.

Here is an article in which Gael Duval talks about the massive funding he received from the EU : https://www.projets-libres.org/en/podcast/e-os-a-degoogled-android-gael-duval-e-foundation-murena/

ewwlo

Telling the truth about ewwlo since 2018.

@Xtreix

Thanks for these sources, will check them in time :)

I saw that iodeOS runs on the obscure Brax phones. Is that the main OS for them? I thought they had an own one.

Before reading any of this: it is clear that #GrapheneOS is way more secure than #LineageOS, which is the base for both iodeOS and /e/OS.

I dont know if they added bad things, afaik /e/OS did quite some shady proprietary additions [1]. I know that #iodeOS has some nice additions, but from the outside neither are very transparent.

But I would not call them scams right now. Maybe after I know more about their details.

I know for sure that LineageOS is kinda scary as a base. Their releases are all nightlies and they lack verified boot support even on phones that allow custom keys [2].

[1] like integrating #OpenAI #SpeechToText https://community.e.foundation/t/70509/10

[2] Example for the Pixel 9: https://download.lineageos.org/devices/tokay/builds

Voice to Text feature using Open AI

Thank you a lot for your positive and supporting comments about our new /e/OS Voice-to-text! Regarding its implementation in /e/OS, I’d like to explain a few things to explain why we have chosen an OpenAI STT API to implement it and how it’s going to evolve in the future: What we have learned from our experimentations with STT models that run locally on the smartphone for speech recognition: they work quite poorly, they make a lot of mistakes in voice recognition they are not able to mix la...

/e/OS community

@Rhababerbarbar Yes Braxphone run on iodeOS and also support ubuntu touch.

The fact if that LineageOS is more secure and more usable than /e/ and iodeOS, /e/ is a broken fork with significantly worse security and privacy than LineageOS. Gael Duval stole the source code from LineageOS, including that of applications, without citing the code sources, then sold low-end Chinese devices at much higher prices. You can find all this information in the blog I provided.

iodéOS is no better.

It's not ideal, but it is possible to build a good fork of LineageOS focused on a not bad security and privacy, as proof, DivestOS was based on LineageOS, but the lead developer was very honest about its severe limitations. Starting directly from AOSP is a much healthier foundation.

@Xtreix

The partnership between Braxman and iodeOS is concerning for sure. It does not make the project appear trustworthy at all.

But I feel you are mixing iodeOS and /e/OS which is not good practice.

Lets stay with /e/OS for a while as it is more obviously a degrated LineageOS.

Breaking source code licenses is really bad and fits into the image of /e/OS. But again, the stretch to iodeOS is not founded.

I know of DivestOS and it was a very good project. Basing off LineageOSes tooling is not bad, being their downstream is more problematic.

I thought of installing #DivestOS on my old Pixel, but even then GrapheneOS was newer.

Afaik iodeOS has improvements over LineageOS.