*Televisions and phones are for poor people.
@bruces
Whoa. Panem et circenses, Third Millennium version.
@bruces Imagine how much higher "childcare services" would be if TVs weren't so cheap.
@bruces Nice to know my lifestyle of video games and doom scrolling is staying affordable. At least until I need medical care for all the sitting around getting high blood pressure.
@bruces @retiolus What a surprise ! ๐Ÿคญ๐Ÿ˜‚
@bruces That's in US, ain't it?
@szewek @bruces thatโ€™s a bold assumption, it doesnโ€™t even list ammo prices.

@bruces The other way to analyse this is the TVs, phones, etc are for mindless consumers.

The people at the top want their populations dumbed down, not thinking, only emoting and allowing the stuff they consume to tell them what to "think" that's why these things are cheap.

The further up you go, the more thinking is required, college fees, books, etc.

The people at the top do not want their populations to be critical thinkers, because that would mean the inevitable fall of the regime.

@bruces TVs and phones have really gone from tools (the object you use to do something) to extractive mechanisms, with surveillance, etc.

I haven't been in the market for toys in a while, seeing them follow the same trend makes me wondering how bad they got...

@chbug @bruces remember when the DoD banned Furbies? Thatโ€™s when toy companies realized what they could be doing.
@passwordsarehard4 @bruces boundless opportunities... ๐Ÿคฎ
@bruces So the next time you see someone whine about homeless people with cell phonesโ€ฆ

@bruces

Health care, college and food clearly are not.

@bruces "energy" is missing...

@bruces

TV are free, now ?

Because -100% = 0$

Soโ€ฆ

@Monolecte @bruces actually, a 2000 TV is basically free, as no one would pay for it..

this is the joy of the "quality effect" that counts as a decrease on price

your TV is still $500 now, as it was last year, but as it is *better* it would have cost $600 last year (if it existed), and now 500, so it lost $100.

same for cars, in france a basic car is 20kโ‚ฌ, while it was 12kโ‚ฌ, but there is no inflation because you have GPS-integration and heating mirrors that were on luxury cars at the time.

@schlaf @bruces

Itโ€™s a scam : the real incomes didnโ€™t increase enough to pay the new actual price.

@Monolecte @bruces imagine a car from the year 2000, but built with today's technology. no bullshit, use 3L/100km of petrol, could be produced and sold for 10kโ‚ฌ....

damn, so sad that we have to spend 25k for a SUV that is barely more usable, and on this, 1k or even 1.5k of the price is dedicated to the advertisement budget, because, how could you convince people it is somehow acceptable to pay for this shit?