"CAUTION! historical revisionism in operation! I thought that #russia used to say that it had already been fighting #NATO for years!"🤣🤣🤣

From https://t.me/pravdaGerashchenko_en

According to a current #Russian history textbook for high school kids, #NATO advisers were training #Kyiv to launch an offensive on #Donbas and then, #Russia would have been at war with #NATO. This "could not be allowed", so #Russia launched its "special military operation." Oh, and there were #US_biolabs in #Kyiv, obviously.

The author of these lies is #Medinsky - head of #Russia's negotiating team, by the way.

In previous years, the narrative in #Russia has been about "denazifying" and "demilitarizing" #Ukraine as a reason for the "#SMO". Now, it has shifted to "we started a war to avoid confrontation with #NATO". #Russia's rhetoric towards #Europe and #NATO is becoming increasingly more hostile.

Here's a translation of a page from a textbook:

"On #Ukrainian territory, #NATO advisers were training #Kyiv for an offensive on #Donbas. #US biological laboratories, operating under strict secrecy, were established in #Ukraine. #Kyiv expressed its desire to acquire nuclear weapons. #Ukraine’s accession to #NATO was enshrined as a state goal in its Constitution. The return of #Crimea (according to #Ukraine’s military doctrine) was declared by #Kyiv as priority number one.

If #Ukraine, after joining #NATO, had provoked a military conflict in #Crimea or #Donbas, then under #NATO’s Charter, #Russia would have found itself at once at war with all members of the #North_Atlantic bloc - from the #US and the #UK to #Germany and #France.

That might have been the end of civilization.

This could not be allowed."

#ukraine #putinisamasskiller #putinisawarcriminal @kardinal691