Just got an email about an open letter for professors to sign, because the Standing Committee on Science and Research just decided to grab personal demographic info and the EDI portions of tri-council research grant from the last *25 years*. This is really bad. Please please please let's not do anti-science and anti-EDI here in Canada?

Hard to parse all of this, and I don't want the open letter to get spammed so I'm not going to link. Here's the meeting notes: https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/45-1/SRSR/meeting-6/minutes

Minutes - SRSR (45-1) - No. 6 - House of Commons of Canada

Minutes - SRSR (45-1) - No. 6 - House of Commons of Canada

from the letter: Please help us share this letter with your colleagues before November 4th. If you have applied for Tri-Council funding in the last 25 years, all of your data is at risk of being included and sent to an unnamed researcher and MPs on the committee.

If you disagree with this motion, please add your name to this letter and write to the following officials ASAP, and include a message that you don’t consent to your information being shared for this purpose:

The Chair of the SRSR Committee (Salma Zahid, LIB, Scarborough-Centre Don Valley East; Salma.Zahid@parl.gc.ca)

The Health Minister Hon. Marjorie Michel (marjorie.michel@parl.gc.ca )

The Minister of Industry and Canada Economic Development Hon. Melanie Joly (melanie.joly@parl.gc.ca )

File a complaint with Canada's Privacy Commissioner: https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/report-a-concern/file-a-formal-privacy-complaint/

File a formal privacy complaint - Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada

Online forms to make formal complaints against a business, government departments

I got my first email back from an MP about this, and they said out of respect for my privacy they can't share my letter with the committee.

If that ain't ironic I don't know what is. I need to take a break before I get myself in trouble by writing a really rude response to that email.

Hey cool! Apparently that committee that asked for lots of privacy invading info on Canadian research grants actually rescinded their request! Once again, lots of yelling worked! (Apologies for the linkedin link, gross, this is what was shared with me) https://www.linkedin.com/posts/maydianne-andrade_srsr-srsr-srsr-activity-7392186503642353664-SVow

Keep yelling! Keep writing to your gov't reps! Keep complaining! Once in a while it works

#srsr #srsr #srsr | Maydianne Andrade

Mobilization of the Scientific Community across Canada has been successful! As of yesterday, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science and Research #SRSR has essentially rescinded an ethically problematic motion that would have compelled the three main federal granting agencies in Canada to provide disaggregated data, including the personal identity of researchers, to the committee. The new motion asks for *aggregated* and *anonymized* data instead. The research community welcomes a good-faith analysis of research funding processes. We point community members and the #SRSR to the websites of the granting agencies, which provide extensive data on funding programs, including titles and summaries of grant content and aggregated information on where, and to whom, funding goes- a model of transparency and accountability. Let's be clear--anyone can already go to these websites, download multi-year data, then analyze it themselves. This includes the #SRSR. Any claim that the research community or the tri-agencies are wary about transparency is incorrect and contrary to the reality of what is already available. We are wary about being individually targeted as a function of our identity. We are also wary of any process that allows use of our personal data in ways that were not clear when we agreed to provide it. It was the overwhelming response of researchers and allies (including over 5000 signatures on a petition, and hundreds of messages to MPs and members of the SRSR) that led the Chair to open yesterday's meeting with: "this is an urgent issue...it is about the reputation of this committee..." and the unanimous vote in favour of the new motion. View the session here: https://lnkd.in/gJSsfm6C

@sundogplanets I know of Dr. Andrade from her black widow research! 🕷️

@sundogplanets

That response implies that the committee's motives are dishonest.

@sundogplanets

That is quite the catch.

@sundogplanets Translation: "I have been desperately looking for excuses to ignore your letter, and this is the best I could think of"

@sundogplanets

Dies ist bei uns genauso.
Die Irrungen des #datenschutz -es.
Vor kurzem musste ich beim Arzt eine (separate ) Erklärung unterzeichnen, dass ich damit einverstanden bin, dass sie meine Daten nur dann verwenden dürfen, wenn ich ja sage.

@sundogplanets

Dies ist bei uns genauso.
Die Irrungen des #datenschutz -es.
Vor kurzem musste ich beim Arzt eine (separate ) Erklärung unterzeichnen, dass ich damit einverstanden bin, dass sie meine Daten nur dann verwenden dürfen, wenn ich ja sage.

@sundogplanets That sounds counterproductive 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️
@sundogplanets I haven’t been a grant holder but have been listed as a post doc on various grants. I am currently working at a post secondary institute but in a teaching role (with no research component). If that would qualify me to sign the open letter I’d be happy to add my name if you can DM the link. (I’ll definitely contact all of the folks mentioned here as well)
@sundogplanets ok contacted the chair doesn’t work. They say they can’t forward the concern to the committee. Better to use the committee email srsr@parl.gc.ca that way the committee will get the concern.
@Bwacton Yeah I got the same email (Citing privacy concerns 😬) from the chair's office and sent my email to the committee email.
@sundogplanets I read on the minutes "... for applications made between 2020 and 2025".
That doesn't make it better, but is it for grants from the last 5 years?

@redshiftdrift The letter says they have it from a reliable source that the committee changed it to 25 years after the meeting, and their notes online do not reflect that, which is yet another thing to complain about.

What is this committee?!!

@sundogplanets I never heard of the SCSR, it seems it was created in ~2022. The staff has no scientist.
🔗https://www.ourcommons.ca/Committees/en/SRSR/About

@sundogplanets They want the *disaggregated* responses to the diversity, equity, and inclusion questionnaire?!?

JFC that's never a good thing.

@auxonic @shockwaver Yeah. Very very very bad.
@sundogplanets @shockwaver in the past I might have been naive enough to imagine our privacy laws (such as they are. GDPR now!) might protect us but now. Sigh.
@sundogplanets ugh thanks for the heads up, and good luck :( we wish we had standing to get involved

@sundogplanets

I'm sorry that sulking about postulated conspiracies may be metastasizing in Canada.

In some ways it looks even worse than seen in the US. Here, the Government isn't demanding "disaggregated data" that racists, misogynists, and lanquage partisans might need for attacks on individual people. Finding and (mis-)interpreting such data has been left to private political operatives. Are there systems in Canada to prevent (and punish) disclosure of private data?

@sundogplanets We are not supposed to have laws against this kind of requests?? Genuine question.

#Canada