That's 5D-educational chess.

#FuckGenAI #ChatGPT #GenAIsucksCamelDong

@Eatsbluecrayon Another demonstration would be to bring a chessboard to class, along with extra pieces, and have the class play chess with an AI of their choosing. They’ll get to watch with their own eyes as the AI fabricates positions and pieces.

This is especially useful because computers have been beating human opponents at chess for a long time now, so people know that chess is something computers can do. That an AI can’t indicates it is worse than its predecessors.

@WhiteCatTamer @Eatsbluecrayon that's cause it's not an AI, but a really fancy autocorrect. DeepBlue and the like were probability machines using complex computational algorithms and ChatGPT just strings words together that make some kind of grammatical sense, in which grammer =! logic. The mistake that people are falling for is the thought that language is mathematical. It is not. Language is culture, which cannot be summed up through math and numbers. Culture is the synthesis of human emotion and connection. No machine can replicate that. Ever.

@jadedtwin @WhiteCatTamer @Eatsbluecrayon

If you don’t believe everything can be expressed in numbers then consequently you must believe there is some “magic” in which numbers are meaningless.

That simply isn’t the case. From the count of neurons firing, to their relations and positions: every “emotion” can be described with numbers.

Magic or numbers. That’s the choice.

Thus: language is math (numbers encoded).

@altruios @jadedtwin @WhiteCatTamer @Eatsbluecrayon
I see this the other way around.

Humans use numbers to understand things. Every new thing is assigned measurements and studied. This helps a lot in understanding how everything works.

When studying something new, we start by assigning them and seeing how they behave. We need different rules for different processes.

The numbers are not the starting point, they are the way we try to make sense of things that are very complex. If we start with only numbers, we will not be able to figure out anything. We need to give the numbers meaning, and discover the rules behind them.

I'm reminded of Socrates. If you keep asking why, there will be a moment where you don't know. Why do things fall? Well, because of gravity. Why does gravity exist? Well, the earth's mass attracts more mass. This can be explained by diving into molecules and atoms and ions and neutrons and whatnot, but why are there atoms? And why was the big bang? And why does anything exist at all?

For us to assign numbers, we need to understand so much more. And a computer is bound by the logic we give it. Yes, it can make some things up by itself, but those things can be just as wrong as our age-old belief of the flatness of the earth. And the computer will lack knowledge we didn't know it needed. Or things we don't know ourselves.

The world is a magical place, and we are by no means done discovering and making sense of it. ❤️