Steve HermanCalifornia governor’s office says no need for deployment of the National Guard in L.A and to do so in an unlawful manner seriously breaches state sovereignty and seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation.
liroso@w7voa
Well duh!
stony kark@w7voa maybe he’ll have Charlie Kirk back on his podcast to discuss the implications of this for California’s investor class
Levka
Adam Labay
zvhxxl@w7voa "California governor’s office says no need for deployment of the National Guard in L.A."
Is it possible for a state (or city-) government to send away the national guard? Can a state government start it's own militia to stop the national guard's actions?
Just asking, I'm not familiar with U.S. law except from very old TV-series.
Is it possible for a state (or city-) government to send away the national guard? Can a state government start it's own militia to stop the national guard's actions?
Just asking, I'm not familiar with U.S. law except from very old TV-series.
Dan Riley@zvhxxl @w7voa The National Guard is in fact what's left of the state militias. The state militia can be federalized under limited circumstances, which likely are not met by the current situation.
This, incidentally, is what the US 2nd amendment was actually about, originally. The state ought to be able to raise a militia that is entirely under its control, not shared with the federal government as the guard is, but SCOTUS has made such a hash of the 2nd amendment who knows.
Alex
crow
Axomamma
Harleck
Nochem ben ShlomoBut will he mobilize the state patrol to arrest the hated ICE agents?
VessOnSecurity@w7voa Perhaps somebody should point out to him the setting Waymos on fire also tends to inflame the situation...