ActivityPub was when @erincandescent transcribed ancient scrolls onto loose leaf paper, scanned the paper into a scanner, ran it through OCR, and then said "the W3C should learn about this"
And that's how we got ActivityPub
ActivityPub, also known as "ActivityStreams", is just like a spoken language. Subject Predicate Object. It's pretty simple! Except we have Actor Activity Object, which are the same thing. And they're modeled in RDF, which is Subject Predicate Object.
So it's like language squared
ActivityPub is where the AI enthusiasts are
Everyone here loves AI, highest ratio of AI enthusiasts you'll ever meet
All the content is AI and people will thank you for posting it
ActivityPub was when we said FUCK there are TOO MANY PROTOCOLS, let's make one more protocol, and that'll be the last one
And then we did, and it was
ActivityPub is the protocol they make you go on in order to be eligible for HRT or SRS
You post on ActivityPub enough and they say, "okay, I guess you really do have gender dysphoria. you can do whatever you want"
Here's one to explain things to the KIDS:
ActivityPub is Usenet Done Right
ActivityPub is a protocol where the Official Test Suite is a rewrite of MUD (Multi User Dungeon) technology for testing for federation
(this one is TRUE, cursed knowledge if you investigate)
ActivityPub: it's a protocol for "keepin' it normal in here"
Have a normal time!
ActivityPub is an anti-fascist protocol. There are no fascists on here. Not even one.
PROOF: They aren't allowed, we put it in the spec, so if someone is being fascist on here, technically they're not implementing ActivityPub they're doing something else. NOT OUR PROBLEM
ActivityPub is a series of tubes
But not those kinds of tubes. It's actually just a big node graph in Blender. A geometry nodes thing
ActivityPub, the engagement network.
REMEMBER TO LIKE AND SUBSCRIBE
Ahem, old Usenet user here, a lot was truly decentralized in the olden days.
@cwebber Your talk could just be one post from this thread per slide.
With a bit of explanation, if you feel it’s warranted
@jstatepost @cwebber
Of course not - why would you be mad at Mozilla if you didn't use their products?
(Unless you're in the secret third category of people who have worked there and have their own reasons to be mad at Mozilla, but they probably also use Firefox)
@bhearsum @lmorchard can only get mad about things that are important to you so I'm not really surprised 🙃
(FF user too :D)
@ireneista @cwebber
awesome, so they can
☑ Use Firefox
☑ Have worked at Mozilla
☑ Be angry at Mozilla
The holy trifecta :-D
Also, Mozilla, if you are listening, when are you going to start marketing Firefox again like you used to do? That was working.
Make sense to me. Non users have no reason to be mad 😉
@cwebber Firefox looks harmless or even good from the outside. You have to really use a Mozilla product for a while to hate it.
Signed,
Loyal Pocket User