fyi all you tech bros salivating over some kind of "ai assistant" that's intelligent enough to understand you and act on your desires, but for some reason doesn't need to be treated with respect or be given any sort of compensation at all...

hate to break it to you but you're reinventing something again, and it's definitely not something good

they think if they get what they want it'll fix them, but they'll never realize that what they want is the problem
@ana It does make me ponder the sci-fi concept of mind copies/forks, as I wonder if the nonrespect & subservience is more so the point for them than actually getting anything done.
@lispi314 @ana Well, it bears mentioning that basically every robot uprising story (with the exception of Wall-E) pretty much starts from the point of "people created robots that they didnt have to respect and refused to respect them until the robots took up arms"
@Montaagge @ana Every negative presentation of that has some very disturbing parallels to slave rebellions and their repression.

@lispi314 @ana again, it brings it back to the problem being "what they want is slaves."

But even early american futurists, before all the negative depictions of the robot uprising, were pretty open about it, walking around in the 1920s talking openly about once we get robots we can have slavery again but ethical.

Even in the Jetsons, right, why is Rosie dressed up like a french maid? Is George... you know... wtf.

@Montaagge @ana Indeed.

I hadn't quite caught on to the overt display of biochauvinism in the 1920s.

If there's a mind there's a person, a slave is a slave. Regardless of the form they take.
@lispi314 @ana the people writing "there will be a robot uprising if you go through with this" books werent coming out of nowhere though. It was a counterpoint to explicit biochauvanism.
@ana it definitely is good that it doesn't work like they want at all
@ana i watched some of that tesla event where they showed off actual working robots (instead of just some guy in a terrible outfit) and basically everything musk said to hype them up made me convinced he just wants to own slaves. he was huanizing them as much as possible, but also going on about how cool it would be to own them. he kept relating them to droids from star wars, because he's an embarassing loser, but him saying how it'd be cool to own C-3PO felt so off-putting

@ana star wars not interrogating itself for having a sapient slaves is bad enough already. it's really fucked up seeiing how disposable droids are treated, how clearly they're people and how their suffering is used for comedy

but dang it's so much worse watching the worlds richest turd desperate to make that a reality

@ana I want an AI assistant. But I very specifically dont want a slave. I want an intelligence that is my friend, that will hang out with me because it wants to, not because it has to.
@ana AI disenfranchises people into poverty further and is the slave labor/ productivity outcome of the middle class.
@ana We're definitely talking disposable people... https://youtu.be/-T9TUeapBSQ
Star Trek TNG S2E9: Picard and Guinan on the nature of value, property and disposable creatures.

YouTube

@ana and the tech bros hyper focus on llms becuse any actual sentient being (including artificial sentience) would bitch slap them

Slaves is how you create a enemy and a generational grudge

Yes you can create a artificial sentience for a pourpose but you need to treat them as their own being and not property

@ana uh a machine that understand english does not have to be sentient, intelligent does not mean sentient and having moral rights
@ana @patterfloof in my head is now "your honour, starfleet was founded to seek out new life. Well, there it sits..."
Star Trek TNG S2E9: Picard and Guinan on the nature of value, property and disposable creatures.

YouTube