hannahshouse2 🇺🇸 CaliforniaMay 17
The Conversation U.S.
Redefining "harm" in the Endangered Species Act could undo decades of habitat protection for threatened species. The public has until May 19 to comment on the Trump Administration proposal to exclude habitat destruction from the definition. An ecologist and a law professor explain: https://buff.ly/Lguz0su
How redefining just one word could strip the Endangered Species Act’s ability to protect vital habitat

The Trump administration’s plan would leave many endangered species at much greater risk.

The Conversation
May 17 at 5:31pmWeb
Show threadhannahshouse2 🇺🇸 CaliforniaMay 17
@TheConversationUS
Where do I find so this in order to comment against it.
Show threadWhitney LoblawMay 17
@TheConversationUS #alt4u map of the US highlighting in red zones of "critical habitat" for Endangered Species Act-listed species. The article says it currently represents more than 107 million acres of land.
Show threadGordon OliverMay 17
@TheConversationUS to comment — https://www.regulations.gov/search?filter=fws-hq-es-2025-0034
Regulations.gov

Show threadDr. Nancy Wayne ✅May 18
@gordotango @TheConversationUS Thanks!
Show threadDark Phoenix 🇺🇦🇨🇦🇬🇱🇵🇦🇵🇸🏳️‍🌈May 18
@TheConversationUS fuck, is there any good thing left in America, that the orange cockwomble isn't actively trying to destroy? Or in the world, for that matter.