The fediverse just got way easier to join:
The fediverse just got way easier to join:
@dansup that's understandable but please consider removing the label official server.
Ranking it by total or monthly active users is fine but labeling something "official" makes all other servers inherently unofficial/bootleg/subpar.
@dansup @aspensmonster Something to consider: I solved a similar question of how to balance "quality" vs improved discoverability for more obscure entries (in a different domain) by doing:
- "featured + ~5% random shuffle/mix chance per entry"
This way there is plenty at the top of what many people may be looking for. Along with giving more obscure entries a better chance at visibility that may just pay off if the right person sees it.
Suggestion 1: "Asia" is too broad of a category. Might want to break it up.
Suggestion 2: Maybe add one more filter for the server's default/recommended language?
@kopio @dansup
Yes, language is an important criterion, even more so than size of instance.
Other suggestions:
1. Maybe add a comment that it's not so important which instance you choose, since you can easily switch later.
2. Some people have received harassment when they create an account, because their instance federates with instances full of harassers. I know people are working on a long-term solution, but at present maybe the best thing would be to exclude some instances.
@dansup Unfortunately, there is no possibility to sort instances based on the number of active users, a criterion that was well present in the old fedidb.org interface. In fact, this criterion is much more important than the one related to the total number of users. In fact, there are very old instances with a mortality rate higher than 90% that are very numerous, but in reality are not very active.
PS: why are my poliverso.org instance and Ruud's friendica.world friendica.world instance still missing? 😭
@ThePfromtheO Thanks for the good news. I hope friendica.world will come back soon too, it is currently the most active Friendica instance
@ThePfromtheO I couldn't find them because they weren't there 😅
It's already happened other times that they disappeared from fedidb.org
It's probably because of the robosts.txt file and some policies that we had to take to block the damned Meta bots
@dansup Great, thanks! ♥️
PS: If you think we need to fix some configuration issues, let us know what we need to do to fix it
@dansup I dont think this works as is: step 2 is "choose platform". The naive user has _no idea_ on platforms. How are they supposed to choose here?
I would suggest that as a _last_ step, with preselecting all as the default
IMHO :)
(why would anyone be selecting by technology anyway?!?!)
(and, definitely, if you get only one choice in step 2 it should be skipped completely. I picked 'photography" when experimenting, and got only pixelfed and assumed it meant the main pixedfed instance, not the technology...)
but love the concept!!!!! :)
@dansup I like it. I would suggest to change the word "servers" to "communities" just because some people (non-technical) start to panic when they hear "technical" words.
Great job!
@readbeanicecream Server instead seems to me the best compromise: "server" is more usable and understandable than "instance". Be careful not to underestimate the fact that the term communities already exists in the Fediverse: in fact, the term "communities" is happily used by all Lemmy and Piefed users, to indicate in their platform the "Activitypub Groups", exactly like the Mbin "magazines", the BBCode "categories" and the Friendica "groups". Now since Lemmy represents one of the most used software in the Fediverse, it would not be wise to call the instances with the name of communities, but would instead create a bit of confusion
@dansup the most important thing a wise newbe should consider when picking is: who runs the instance? What kind of philosophies guide their mod decisions? What is the hosting setup (for reliability, regeonality and jurisdiction)? Do they block federation to anyone?
would be cool if this enabled insight to that stuff.
@dansup It should definitely have a little addition to the "Choose your platform" page that compares to existing sites.
Normal users don't know what the heck the difference is between Mastodon or Pixelfed, nor do they always realize that "photo sharing" is what you'd describe something like Instagram as.
I believe there should be some kind of comparison. (e.g. Mastodon - description - Similar to: Twitter/X, Bluesky)
Yeah we need a lot more knuckle dragging tool users on here.
Suggestions:
- Add a language filter.
- Add the middle east as a separate region.