JK, are you listening? Oh, thatโ€™s right, you never do any more.

@georgetakei

๐ŸŽฏ

"Feminism" that really cares about women's safety puts 100x more energy into the threat from cis men and the complicit enablers - because the actual threat from trans people is miniscule.

I don't want to dismiss anyone's concerns, but look at the bigger picture and see who you're allied with.

@georgetakei

I just see it from a different view. If a person says, I identify myself as a man and I want to use Men's Bathroom, I really got no problem with that. But please wash your hands, ok?

Should we make a gene test on everybody who wants to use a toilet or what?

@georgetakei hence itโ€™s much more apt to not call them trans-exclusionary radical feminists anymore, but feminism-appropriating radical transphobe.

makes for a better acronym, too.

@georgetakei Patriarchy gave her a $1bn, she's never going to challenge it.

@georgetakei

TERFs don't really give a shit about other women either. Just look at Nancy Mace, JKR, etc, and what bitches they all are.

@georgetakei AND it would help if people could mind their own business and stop trying to outlaw the pursuit of happiness promised in the Declaration
@georgetakei By JKโ€™s own definition, that a woman is someone who can give birth, she is no longer one.