Tracy ReedThis is the only place I can post this where someone might actually get it.
Eldritch kcarruthers@treed 🤣
Nick@kcarruthers @treed that is brilliant
Bin Chicken 🗑𓅠@treed They won't understand you in this place if you rip-off someone else's joke and remove the Alt-text from the image.
@BinChicken Sorry, that's just how it came to me. Who originated it? I would definitely prefer to link to the original source and give credit where due!
@treed Are you asking me to Google it for you?
@BinChicken Google image search turns this up as the first (and only) relevant result in which @dangillmor is also seeking the original source. Hey Dan, did you ever find the result? I'm here trying to do the right thing and @BinChicken is being a concern-trolling dickhead and keeping secrets.
@treed You're making it difficult to find a good-faith interpretation of your reply by referring to me as a "concern-trolling dickhead".
On the other hand, from the way you're talking, it sounds like you _do_ need help on how to use Google:
- It's in the image search results if you have the patience to look beyond the first link.
- Another way to find a link to the source is to search for text from the image and put the search term inside quotes.
On the other hand, from the way you're talking, it sounds like you _do_ need help on how to use Google:
- It's in the image search results if you have the patience to look beyond the first link.
- Another way to find a link to the source is to search for text from the image and put the search term inside quotes.
@BinChicken Wait, you aren't saying that I should be crediting https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_and_Bob are you? Because I'm pretty sure we all know that's what it's parodying. I mean, you won't get the joke if you don't know that *that's* the source of the parody! :D
@treed Please stop. You don't need to explain how humour works.
Anthony DavidTop Marks!
SibrosanBut do *you* get that this is not applicable?
Because Goldberg *did not intercept* the communication, he was actually one of the participants, having been invited to the chat.
It was not a cryptographic issue.
Writing Slowly@treed He 'intercepted' the communication? I thought he just accepted the kind invitation to participate. Clearly this someone is too pedantic to actually get it 😁
Hippo 🍉@writingslowly @treed maybe that should be:
Example scenario of the classic "invitation attack" where communication between Hegseth and Walz is inadvertently intercepted by Goldberg
Deven Phillips@treed
I think this will definitely replace Alice and Bob! 😁
I think this will definitely replace Alice and Bob! 😁
jkdelauney@treed this is beautiful!
mav 
Alexander Knochel@treed Goldberg joining the cast himself I see :)
`Da Elf@treed
**Roaring Laughter**
I'm glad I want shipping coffee for that one or there be mopping to do.
Bill, organizer of stuff@treed Plz add alt text so we can boost!
@wcbdata What should the alt text say?
Blackoverflow@treed
Maybe something like:
An altered version of https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_und_Bob where the names of the communication participants are replaced by "Hegseth" and "Waltz" and the name of the intercepting party changed to "Goldberg".
Maybe something like:
An altered version of https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_und_Bob where the names of the communication participants are replaced by "Hegseth" and "Waltz" and the name of the intercepting party changed to "Goldberg".
@blackoverflow Done! Thanks.
nimi@treed I just talked to Alice and Bob and they approve of it!
lucasmz (en)@treed damn germany
fanf42@treed this is insta-classical lore.
It is known.
Baron Vonskinnback