I know I'm like a broken record on this, but any negative news on the economy (even mildly negative) like this was CONSTANTLY used by the media to justify their relentlessly negative coverage of the economy and approval rating under Biden but isn't getting nearly the level of attention under Trump.

There should be weeks long stories and headlines about this, as well as endless coverage on news shows.

Trump's approval rating on economy at lowest of presidential career:
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/19/trumps-approval-rating-on-economy-drops-to-lowest-of-his-presidential-careerat-.html

Trump's approval rating on the economy drops to lowest of his presidential career, CNBC Survey finds

President Donald Trump is registering the worst economic approval numbers of his presidential career, according to the latest CNBC All-America Economic Survey.

CNBC
@TonyStark I've read that trump fans actually believe that that financial pain will be necessary before the " golden age" finally arrives. They are willing, as always, to make excuses for him. Utopia is right around the corner. Commercial media, by underplaying dire financial news, is keeping their hopes alive for now. The charade may not be sustainable when recession arrives.

@Barbramon1 A guy that works at a plant that’s a customer of mine for work told me in January that everything was going to close, including banks, and that we should all stock up on what we need and then once DOGE was done, everything would reopen and all the money would be deposited into Trump voters’ bank accounts.

That was supposed to take 3 months. 🤔

@TonyStark The delusion is mind boggling. Some people are expecting a $5,000 "dividend" check from DOGE.
Trump mentioned it in March. It was in the news for a minute and spread all over the internet. He has said nothing about it since then.

@Barbramon1 @TonyStark

What’s amazing to me about this is they are cutting 1) things that don’t cost taxpayers a dime (eg FDIC) and 2) things that SAVE tax dollars (eg IRS). The cognitive dissonance is truly flabbergasting.

@Bam @Barbramon1 I always hope that the general public will try and become better informed, but they seem dead set on being less so.
@Bam @Barbramon1 @TonyStark Once we understand that it's what PUtin wants, it is no longer flabbergasting.
That the rest of the folks in governmnet are fine with it is appalling but I"m not going to let them gast my flabbers.
@geonz @Bam @TonyStark
Although I have known for years that trump is Putin's puppet, there are still times when I sit in wonderment that he was able to ascend to the US presidency.

@geonz @Bam @Barbramon1 @TonyStark Here, let me fix that for you:

"That the rest of the GOP in Congress are fine with it is appalling...."

(Most congressional Dems are actually quite sane, but they're hopelessly outnumbered.

@jhlibby @geonz @Bam @Barbramon1 Yeah- the pro-Putin stuff is GOP only.

@geonz @jhlibby @Bam @Barbramon1 Feel free to name a pro-Putin Democrat. Yes, REALLY.

How Putin Co-Opted the Republican Party | TIME
https://time.com/6757904/trump-russia-republican-party/

How Putin Co-Opted the Republican Party

Trump’s Putin adoration and the GOP's position are now indistinguishable. The signs are clear at CPAC, where Navalny's death may be largely dismissed

Time
@TonyStark @jhlibby @Bam @Barbramon1 Think hard about this.
Plato says: "Silence gives consent."

@geonz @jhlibby @Bam @Barbramon1 Think hard about this: you’re either uniformed or a troll.

Clyburn gives GOP a new nickname: ‘Groupies of Putin’:
https://thehill.com/policy/international/4487402-clyburn-gives-gop-new-nickname-groupies-of-putin/

Clyburn gives GOP a new nickname: ‘Groupies of Putin’

House Minority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) went after Republicans Saturday, branding the GOP with a new nickname: “Groupies of Putin.” Clyburn, who announced he would step down from leadership in 2024, argued Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and his other GOP colleagues have only been doing the business of Russian President Vladimir Putin “at the behest…

The Hill
@geonz @TonyStark @jhlibby @Bam @Barbramon1 Dude. You're illiterate. Quoting Plato doesn't hide how illiterate you are.
Begone with your "both are the same" bullshit.
@Bam @Barbramon1 @TonyStark It's cognitive dissonance only as long as you believe it's about saving tax dollars. When you look at it as a deliberate dismantling of government, it makes a lot more sense.
@TonyStark @Barbramon1@mas.to 🤦🏿‍♀️

@TonyStark @Barbramon1

i just can't anymore

the stupidity is astonishing

@TonyStark @Barbramon1

That's insane. Do you want to see ten million people march on Washington? Close the banks.

@bruce @Barbramon1 Somehow this guy thought it was a great idea.

I hate feeling this way but I think to myself all the time that people like this are out driving on the same roads I am.

@TonyStark @Barbramon1

LOL. I drive for a living. I can attest that far too many people have a driver's license.

@bruce @TonyStark @Barbramon1
In North America they are handed out like prizes in a cereal box.

Compare to Scandinavian countries where you have to demonstrate proficiency with how an automobile works, take mandatory schooling, summer and winter driving courses...

I'm surprised as many people survive on North American roads as they do.

@evdelen @bruce @Barbramon1 Excuse me? Hey, I’m not down with a lot but we do have drivers’ tests and so on. They’re not just handed out and it’s a bit expensive.

@TonyStark @bruce @Barbramon1
Country: Cost - Road Deaths /100,000ppl
Sweden: CAN$2,150 - 2.57
Norway: USD$2,000 - 1.76
Finland: CAN$1,250 - 3.09
Denmark: USD$1,500 - 3.00
Ontario: > CAN$350 - (Canada) 4.58
California: USD$45 - (US) 11.10!!!!

Cost seems to be correlated to safety...

@evdelen @bruce @Barbramon1 It is 200 dollars in Norway and the rest is this is just bullshit wasting my time. Bye!

@TonyStark @bruce @Barbramon1
Admittedly I've never been, but my research indicates it's around 20,000kr for the mandatory components, but up to 45,000kr for optional components that can result in lower insurance.

Right now 1 Norwegian Krone ≈ CAD$0.13

@TonyStark @Barbramon1

Yes, because as we learned from our Trump Covid experience, shutting off the economy and turning it back on has absolutely no side effects, much less unexpected ones.

The Next Terrorist Attack

And What Comes After

Thinking about...

@Barbramon1 @TonyStark They change their tune every day. They were claiming the economy would instantly get better if this guy got elected again. Now they are parroting the “temporary pain” line from their dear leader.

Truly sad and pathetic.

@Barbramon1
The ones with investible resources are telling each other this is a buying opportunity.
@TonyStark I will NEVER forget or forgive the corporate media hit job on #Biden on the economy (his age, approval ratings, ad infinitum). They bear (a LOT of) partial responsibility for the clusterfck we’re in right now.
@PamelaBarroway @TonyStark
Me neither. He should have sued them for defamation but he is too moral.
@PamelaBarroway @TonyStark
I won’t say they’re solely responsible, but they could have single-handedly changed the result.
As could Mitch McConnell, the person I judge most culpable.
@TonyStark Biden had a problem with messaging and framing the economy, instead of saying the inflation was transitory the framing should have been "Wow look at how messed up Trump left the economy. I guess we have to roll up our sleeves and try our best to get out of this Trump f**k up". Trumperdink rather than being a framing issue, just overturned the table w/presumption that he'd find something out of the self-made mess to claim victory. He was wrong, & the global economy is worse off for it

@TonyStark

Its all because of the profit motive.

When the economy is good but a small fire breaks out, its news. Sell it.

When the economy is burning to the ground with no end in sight, its not news, its how it is, and nobody wants to be reminded... but shine a light on a tiny bright spot in the carnage, and by god that's news! Sell it!

Whatever it takes to sell the next commercial.

Pass a law banning commercials and "product placements" on news programming, and requiring 30 minutes of news programming from every channel daily, would cure that problem. Nothing else will.

It'll never happen; politicians depend heavily on manipulating the news cycles, and, republicans have it down to an artform. Democrats just spend their time in-fighting and trashing each other.

We can't pass laws benefitting the public interest... republicans won't allow it.

We can't stop republicans from propagandizing every news report they can touch.

Our only hope is for Democrats to cut the bullshit.