Should we all just read A City on Mars and call the whole thing off?
https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/04/should-the-us-prioritize-settling-mars/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social
@doctor_zoidberg @trcwm @arstechnica Here's the thing -- MAGA was created in part by Russian, Iranian, and Chinese psyop/influence campaigns.
We need the equivalent opposite. Viral MAGA-oriented TikToks, not Ad Council AM radio spots.
We need viral posts with MAGA heroes who show how awesome and powerful America is because of Science and Democracy
EDIT: The whole idea of colonizing Mars makes *no sense* with current technology. O'Neill cylinders, though, are feasible
@arstechnica please go...and take them with you...
(You know who)
@arstechnica just remember, when @ZachWeinersmith started writing that book, he was a lot more optimistic about settling Mars.
The reality is depressing, Mars is simply too hostile and too far away.
@arstechnica
Colonial settler projects depend on vital resources already being managed by people you can steal them from. If the US had had to be built from scratch on Antarctica it'd have died out in a few years. Mars is *considerably* worse than Antarctica.
Therefore, yes they should. Fuck em.
I don't think A City On Mars says it's impossible to settle Mars. What it says is that it will be very, very difficult and identifies the current significant technical, social, political, and legal barriers that exist.
Whining about someone properly scoping the problems out doesn't exactly scream "steely eyed missile man" to me. It's the people saying it should be easy that need to get it together.
Well, the dust is not to be ignored eh?
Oh dear. The problems with lunar dust are well known and have been since the 60s. Martian dust being similar seems likely and reasonable.
It's a great book. Well researched, and points out key areas where hopium is replacing actual plans and technology.
@arstechnica The US should prioritize _sticking to a plan_. The biggest thing slowing down US space ambitions is changing plans every 5-10 years for things that need 10-20 years to do.
It would be less of a problem if unlimited money was thrown at NASA to solve all problems, but NASA hasn't had such luxury for more than 50 years.
@arstechnica Or read the book and address some issues with the power that's needed to not get off on the wrong foot.
Lol jk let's plunder everything and cause more mass destruction
@arstechnica I'm all for sending several arks to mars.... and have all the important people in the first ark so they can prepare everything for the remaining arks.....
They are important after.all amd we can't.possibly survive without them....