@mmasnick brings up a great point on this fediverse panel. Social doesn’t have to be big. Use the protocols being built to create cool small websites with a social aspect for you and your friends. It doesn’t have to be everything everywhere all at once. Totally agree!
I don’t think my college-aged kids would agree with this statement. You need the network effects of all your friends joining and then you need scale to bring in “random” interesting content.
@rob I can’t argue with that..I’m old and just want a way to connect with interesting people without being harassed.
I do think the fediverse has allowed me to be more of my authentic self (openly gay) than I ever felt comfortable elsewhere. Smaller, safer? So be it.
I’m glad you aren’t being harassed.
But I have seen a few women in the technical space on Mastodon complain bitterly that they were being harassed.
I personally got attacked by what I think was a Russian account and a bunch of real idiots when I suggested early on that the Harris campaign was not succeeding.
Small as it is, there are trolls and evil people here in the Fediverse too.
Fyi - I’m old too.
Saw this and thought about this thread. Signal is not so different than the Fediverse in that it needs more people to succeed.
Meredith talks about the important social aspects of Signal.
https://www.youtube.com/live/AyH7zoP-JOg?si=G4spsN-ijebU6gSM