RDF people: why does everyone still use RDFS and not SHACL for writing schemas, when all the actual validation tools are for SHACL?

Are there even any RDFS validators? I can't find any.

#rdf #semanticweb #rdfs #shacl

@multimeric I think they serve different purposes. #rdfs is not really a schema language, at least not in the "here is a prescribed structure you can validate against" sense. It was more intended as a descriptional thing, something to define basic vocabulary ("my model is about kinds of vehicles, like cars, and bikes"). A lightweight ontology language if you will. SHACL is about setting structure constraints, and data validation. They're complementary IMO.

@abrokenjester

Thanks, that helps me understand the mindset.

I guess it also makes sense that the simpler language has more adoption. I suspect that SHACL can be simple if you want it to, though.

Still, automated validation is massively important to me!