RDF people: why does everyone still use RDFS and not SHACL for writing schemas, when all the actual validation tools are for SHACL?
Are there even any RDFS validators? I can't find any.
RDF people: why does everyone still use RDFS and not SHACL for writing schemas, when all the actual validation tools are for SHACL?
Are there even any RDFS validators? I can't find any.
Thanks, that helps me understand the mindset.
I guess it also makes sense that the simpler language has more adoption. I suspect that SHACL can be simple if you want it to, though.
Still, automated validation is massively important to me!