https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEJpZjg8GuA

@wonkothesane I'll be real with you: this platform needs both better tools for those with large accounts and it needs a culture which isn't quite so trigger-happy to push popular accounts off the platform.
There are frictions here which are very hard to understand for the majority of its users.
@wonkothesane @TechConnectify honestly, I rather hope that Bluesky is constructed to make it functionally impossible. More options is always better. I don't have much faith in that yet, since there aren't yet any other "instances" of the ATproto, but theoretically it should be just as resistant to platform decay as the Fediverse.
Of course, the best case scenario would be for the ATproto and ActivityPub to eventually become natively cross-compatible. There's no real reason it couldn't be.
Just went to a bluesky "tweet". Couldn't see it because it requires you to have an account on BS.
How does anyone push accounts off a federated system?
@number6 Random hostile behavior on other people's posts is one way Fediverse drives people away. Trying to push one's own norms as inviolate rules onto others is another.
@TechConnectify @pol_9000 I think Pol was being snarky. In some ways because Mastodon is harder to use that makes it a better platform.
That said, Mastodon is very much a labor of love. You had said computing is a solved problem, yet here is a very real problem that needs to be addressed: Making a usable decentralized social media platform! There's no large money interests developing it, and that's one of the reasons why it is difficult to use.
Little confused when you say culture that isn't trigger happy to push big creators off the platform.
So from my perspective, I have shared your video in two places and star'd the post.
I don't have optics on any aggressive actions towards you, but I'm also not looking THAT hard. In what ways are people trying to push you off?
@BlueBee I think if you go to his posts he explains what the experience has been on Mastodon:
https://mas.to/@TechConnectify/112995453946857071
@SymTrkl@anarres.family I have argued many times, and will continue to do so, that one of the biggest problems Mastodon has is that other people cannot see a lot of the crap that I see, AND there aren't any effective ways for the crowd to reinforce good behavior and discourage bad behavior. Until people sit with that reality, this simply isn't a functional social media tool for me.
Ah, I didn't realize there was more that he had spoken about.
That is one thing (of many) I am frustrated by with social media. The sort of disjointed nature of it. He had made the arguments in the past, but it wasn't in THAT post.
I'm not sure what else can be done except begin regulating posts, but a central regulator is obviously bad. Too much power in too few hands.
I think we should probably have our own review structure of people kind of like steam does for games. But you get to say who's reviews you trust and you ignore everyone else's.
Where you and me and other people can say if we trust someone or not and then if you trust them their opinion of people affects the trust levels of others. And then allow people to be sortable by your personal trust levels for them.
I don't know if I'm explaining that well, but I don't want to spend too much time on it right now. Hopefully it gives the jist of the idea. If someone is a troll, I don't want to see them. But I don't trust a giant corporation to tell me who is and isn't a troll. YouTube surfaced Jordan Peterson to me and that man is an idiot.
So much of the pain people feel reading comments would be alleviated if we had a bit more proof required before allowing people to take up air time. I'm not saying turn people off, but label them differently, trolls shouldn't show up the same as someone who will engage with you with care.
I really only trust who I trust.
If you say sentiment analysis I'm now trusting the software and the writer of the software.
I would prefer people's opinions, and especially those who I trust.
Just allow me to say if I trust people or not and allow others to subscribe to that trust or not.
And allow me on the fly to disagree with someone else's trust. Someone shows up as gold trust with a flurry of bad takes. Let me override and say I don't need to hear them anymore.
This isn't context collapse lol.
And the reason why I'm talking about video games is because video games are less complex to review than people, and if you can't write a program that can review them, then you can't write a program that can review people.
On how this relates to his issue, he is saying that the problem is he gets 1 to 1 good to bad takes. A big part of this is that he has no method of sorting these takes. They are all viewed equally. So no matter if it's a well respected scientist or a troll, they all look the same.
Some method of determining trust is required, but if you give this to a single entity like with Blue sky it's too much power for an individual entity to have. But it still needs to be solved as the original poster has stated.
We have a giant pool of very capable reviewers who could help the larger creators sort through people and find who they should probably be listening to, but they lack the levers to provide that service.
@BlueBee Not sure if you are aware, but the “show me the proof…” response is typically viewed as a “reply guy” approach and is a form of sealioning
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning
I just started following TC and have seen his posts about people giving him grief on Mastodon. It may be worth scrolling back through his feed a bit before asking him to do the work to prove his experience to you
Wow, look at the difference between your reply and the guys above you.
But I will say I could have looked a bit harder.
The issue was his ideas are broken up across many posts. In some ways that is also a critique of Mastodon.
@david
You can follow hashtags. And you should use hashtags on messages, because people follow hashtags to see messages regarding certain topics also from people who they do not follow.
Groups are another thing that exists.
@david @TechConnectify
I'm new here, decided to try it out because of its mention in the video.
Is the "explore" page not effective at finding new stuff?
@MHeezy @david It's not amazing. But! Here, I wrote up some starter tips on how new people can fill out their feed. People do seem to like them:
https://mastodon.murkworks.net/@moira/113484112202118788
Welcome and good luck!
Attached: 1 image I'm definitely seeing new followers. Hi! Thanks for coming here. I know it's fiddly but I think it's worth it. Here's the most important tip I can give you: \🥳/ HASHTAGS \🥳/ Like old Twitter, this place lives on hashtags. Here's how to use them: 1) Put tags on EVERYTHING you don't want hidden. 1A) Seriously. Everything. Keep them appropriate! But. 2) FOLLOW hashtags. That's a thing you can do here. You can follow a hashtag like you can follow a person. Type in the search box, select it, then click follow. 3) Whenever you see someone interesting on that hashtag? Follow them. Follow people WITH ABANDON. Unfollow if it doesn't work out, that's okay here! That's it. Welcome! #twitter #x #BlueSky #TwitterMigration #mastotips
@TechConnectify @wonkothesane Alright, ramble warning. TL;DR you're right and more people on here should be doing something about it.
I honestly think that more people should be lighting a fire under Mastodon for this. There are plenty of improvements that have been proposed to it going back years but a lot of them have been ignored under the "benevolent dictator for life" model, which Mastodon is only now preparing to move on from. It's resulted in it falling far behind and letting Bluesky run laps around it effortlessly. That and there really needs to be more UX people in FOSS.
As for the culture, someone higher up really needs to start taking a harder stance against the constant scolding that some people do. Yelling at someone to content-warn a post under something that the original poster didn't even know was a problem or condescendingly saying that someone should switch to Linux for the apparent crime of using Windows, even for reasons outside of their control (e.g. not everything works under WINE or a VM), is a huge issue that somehow hasn't been addressed.
And, well, there's the everything else about decentralized, federated networks that result in a very awkward experience for those coming from centralized platforms, but Mastodon seems to be working on that so I can at least give them that. Maybe the "it's scraping our posts, white techbro" sect can chill at least a little bit once FASPs get implemented.
@pirat3spaceship @TechConnectify I'm sure I can start this conversation with the fact that complete context awareness of replies still does not exist.
On a smaller server? Not as much connectivity? No or few replies to OP. And why? Because they haven't implemented basic context feeding of replies to servers for 8 years.
https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/32615
It's taken 8 years for someone external to the project to do the dirty work, and it's still not incorporated.
Today I noticed that @TechConnectify has an account here in addition to #BlueSky and I was just about to ask how the two platforms compared for that sort of usage. And then I saw that my question had already been answered 🙂
I think this is a very useful bit of feedback for #fediverse / #mastodon from exactly the sort of content creator that a lot of you want to see coming to this platform.
I would only add one other thought, I'm suspecting the character count limits between interfaces to the two platforms might also be significant to TC.
Otherwise I had been wondering about whether it's better to have accounts on both platforms or just to use those gateway services between the two.
(Also, I don't know, maybe I should be doing a quote post with this, because it does seem to break the stream of conversation, but I don't know)
@TechConnectify @wonkothesane would you say that the context-free drive-bys are more common on Bluesky than here or about the same? Because I don't think there's a discovery algorithm on Mastodon pushing that churn, just reposts and the global timeline.
Earnest question because I'm curious.