Bringing this highly requested feature to #Mastodon and the fediverse is not as trivial as some might think, but quote posts are coming. Here is our latest write-up about our progress:

https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2025/02/bringing-quote-posts-to-mastodon/

Bringing Quote Posts to Mastodon

Sharing our thinking and progress on bringing Quote Posts to Mastodon, with a goal to create a safe and respectful space for everyone.

Mastodon Blog
Mastodon에서 페디버스의 인용 게시물에 대해 국제표준 협의를 추진하는 듯.
스레드닷컴 인용도 잘 동작.
@MastodonEngineering "You will be able to withdraw your post from the quoted context at any time." I appreciate that! 💚

@MastodonEngineering I love it, but can you also focus on fetching replies from other servers so Mastodon can actually be contextually aware?

There's even a pull request.
https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/32615

Add Fetch All Replies Part 1: Backend by sneakers-the-rat · Pull Request #32615 · mastodon/mastodon

Fix: #9409 Fix: #14017 Fix: #18150 Original PR Here: NeuromatchAcademy#44 Further description here: NeuromatchAcademy#43 I've never made a PR for upstream before, so forgive me if i'm doing...

GitHub
@shanie @MastodonEngineering yes, we are aware of that PR and working on it as part of future improvements as well.
@andypiper @shanie @MastodonEngineering This PR could be even more important for Mastodon to gain popularity than quoting posts.

@shanie @MastodonEngineering Considering a quote is just a fancy reply....

Perfect Quote Toots kind of require 3 major things to be solved in any order:
* Quote toots
* Toot Control
* Reply Sync

@MastodonEngineering ooh, this looks great. Much respect for the thoughtful way in which you've approached it, and I look forward to the FEPs :)
@MastodonEngineering Please don't do this. Design choices that allow users to quite literally put their opinion above someone else's statements are absolutely poisoneous for any attempts to create a more egalitarian form of communcation.
@konkrit @MastodonEngineering no reason it has to be in that order - my server has (limited) quoosts and they lead with the quoted post, which helps with that.
@barometz @MastodonEngineering That would be better, yes. However, in essence I believe that wouldn't really change much in terms of where or rather to whom attention is being directed, and I think that would create the exact same attention economic dynamics as the ones that I (and I think many, many other people on here) tried to escape.
@barometz And yes, I've seen that they are planning to implement some "failsafes" mechanisms, which is cool, but honestly I'd rather not have this feature at all.

@konkrit @barometz The lack of a quoting feature is part of the reason that we can't attract many black people, because they are using quotes to keep themselves safe.

You and I may not need or want it, but they do.

The fediverse is far too white, so we should cater to their needs.

Edit: Here's a thread by a renowned black scholar on the subject: https://zirk.us/@shengokai/109347027270208314

Dr. Johnathan Flowers (@shengokai@zirk.us)

The quote tweet function in conjunction with the hashtag are what allow users to align with communities, and communities with conversations through how they enable cultural practices by means of a digital environment. On Black Twitter, the quote tweet and hashtag enable what Black cultural scholars call "call and response," something crucial to Black community practices. The hashtags curate the conversation and allow for its visibility.

zirkus

@gunchleoc @konkrit @barometz

black people or African American people?
🤔

@elCelio @konkrit @barometz I guess that depends on whether this includes non-American black people? I'm not an expert on the matter, so I don't know how bad the racism is there. However, since social media are international, I expect it to be bad for everyone who isn't white as a bed sheet like me.

@gunchleoc @konkrit @barometz

I'm asking because I read some posts that the feature is very useful for the Black community, but these posts come only from accounts part of, or related to, the African American community.

So, it may be that this feature that will be implemented will be useful in the American culture, but may be harmful to people of other cultures and countries (which is what I experienced).

@elCelio @konkrit @barometz The problem is that every feature can be used both in a positive manner and in a destructive manner.

A good example of feature misuse is flooding moderators with report spam - we still do need a reporting feature though!

@elCelio @konkrit @barometz
The only thing one can do is make a risk assessment and mitigate the potential harms, and it sounds like the Mastodon team is taking their time and collecting lots of feedback for their implementation, e.g. their plan is that you can disallow being quoted in your profile, or unhook your post from a quote.
@gunchleoc @konkrit @barometz
yes, I like that they thought about that instead of rolling it out immediately.

It's a good point, the work on Black digital practices (including quote tweets) I'm familiar with is all very US-based.

@elCelio @gunchleoc @konkrit @barometz

@konkrit @barometz @MastodonEngineering I think that ship has sailed. You are not alone in finding the absence of QTs a positive benefit of Mastodon; but it does seem that many more people feel the opposite way. (Note that their post does discuss these issues.)

@konkrit @barometz @MastodonEngineering Note especially:

* You will be able to choose whether your posts can be quoted at all.
* You will be notified when someone quotes you.
* You will be able to withdraw your post from the quoted context at any time.

@mike @konkrit @barometz @MastodonEngineering does this rtracting work with other software too, or can a mastodon user quote my gotosocial posts without my consent?

@sotolf @mike @konkrit @barometz @MastodonEngineering for the limiting/retracting to work, your server needs to implement this.

But this whole discussion/proposal is somewhat miss guided, since this only can limit the new native quote toots, while nothing can stop anyone from just linking to toots, like we all do now.
This tries to enforce something, that can only work if people play nice.

@mxk @mike @konkrit @barometz @MastodonEngineering i'm okay with linking, since I can deal with that, what with private posts, or ones with limited reach? That maastodon forces this on us is really bad..
@sotolf @mike @konkrit @barometz @MastodonEngineering what should be with those? Everything except private posts can be linked to anyways.
This is just linked posts with additional (optional) magic on top.
TBH, quoted posts IMHO should just be a UI feature, like they were in old Twitter. These optional steps on top create chaos and a false sense of control which fundamentally isn't possible since you still could just simply link.
@mxk @sotolf @mike @konkrit @barometz @MastodonEngineering Which is exactly what you have to do, and probably everyone in the thread has done it in the last week.
How else can you boost a message about trunp and add "Yes, he should be in prison!"?
@mxk @sotolf @konkrit @barometz @MastodonEngineering That's right. In the absence of mechanism, people who want to quote-post do so anyway using copy-paste and/or linking, which the original poster has absolutely no control over. This proposal, when implemented, will give original posters more control than they currently have.
@mike I've read the post, and I see that they try to make it possible to opt-out of being directly involved in this; I just wish it wouldn't happen at all, and I have zero understanding for why people would want it.

@konkrit "I have zero understanding for why people would want it."

That surprises me. "We have learned that many groups use Quote Posts as their primary means to build consensus and community on other platforms. Quote Posts used in this way convey trust and respect for the original post, building on or enhancing an original idea."

Even if that's not been your experience, surely you can understand that others' has been different. (Mine included, for what it's worth.)

@mike Yeah, well, that's an incredibly vague statement though. What other platforms, what communities, how exactly would me quote-posting your post here (whether in an affirmative or negative way) signal anything to other users apart from what I intend it to be? I'm just not clear what the argument is here.

@konkrit In the end, the argument is that there are communities that want this, even though you are not a member of any of them. And the devs are bending over backwards to give both those communities and you what they want.

For what it's worth, I very often quote-post someone whose post introduces a subject that I want to comment further on. (Or I did, back when I was on the Hellsite.)

@mike I understand this, but I don't see why a) a lot of people wanting something actually makes it good for the greater whole and b) Mastodon needs to offer features from other platforms instead of itself as a one that does things differently.
@konkrit OK, I understand your point of view. But I'm not sensing a lot of empathy from you regarding others' perspectives. Isn't it enough that it will make things better for a lot of people?
@mike Well, my concern is precisely that it might things worse for all people when it sets in motion the same attention economic downward spiral that we've all experienced at Twitter.
@konkrit I understand your concern.

@konkrit @mike yeah, I second this - often, the thing that people (think they) want, may not be the best way to go.

Think about it, if you ask anyone, they will say they want lower taxes. But then if everyone's taxes were lowered, the roads would be filled with potholes etc.

People are (generally) really bad at assessing the deeper consequences of their desires, when implemented.

So, I'm with Kristoffer on this. Though I think many will opt out of it altogether, and I am hopeful because of that, it won't harm our communities all that much 🙏🏼

@bazkie @konkrit Your tax examples is apposite. But as the blogpost shows, a LOT of thought has gone into this. It's not as though the developers just went "Oh, some people like QTs, better add them".

Anyway, we're unlikely to agree on whether they might the right choice, but I hope we can at least agree that they have moved slowly, carefully and sensitively ... in the direction you didn't want.

@mike @konkrit yeah I very much appreciate this wasn't a quick decision. 🙏🏼 It's indeed one of those things with communities; sometimes they move in directions you don't want as an individual. It is what it is. Can't please everyone :)
@mike I really appreciate the patience and grace in your reponses in this whole thread. Cheers!

@konkrit @mike People want this feature because they want to quote, rather than reply. In order words, they don't want to engage in two way conversation they want a one sided monologue.

The only people who want this feature are those who used this feature on X / Twitter, who then migrated to Mastodon because want an alternative to X / Twitter, as long as that alternative is exactly the same as X / Twitter.

The whole purpose of quotes is not to reply. It serves no other function.

@Rastal @konkrit @mike I don't use quote posts as a way to not reply, I use them as a way to explain why I'm sharing it, to add my experience, to say how much I appreciate it. As it stands, even though Mastodon is my last remaining social media platform, I feel like I'm not part of it. Not that that's necessarily a bad thing! But now I'm wondering, am I just doing it wrong? (genuine question) Is there a difference in technique that explains why some of us want quote posts while others say they aren't necessary? I completely get your concerns about them being misused.
@Janeishly @Rastal @konkrit (The part that makes me sad is when the people who don't want quote-posts say that, therefore, NO-ONE should have them.)
@mike If this is in reference to my original post, I hope it came across that my point wasn't "I don't like this, so no-one should have it," and rather "I don't think this will benefit the community as a whole." Personally, I don't want to take anything away from anyone and do not criticise anyone for wanting or using it. My concern is that this will contribute to the development of the sort of winner-takes-all mode of communication that we've seen unfold on Twitter, etc.

@konkrit
> my point wasn't "I don't like this, so no-one should have it," and rather "I don't think this will benefit the community as a whole."

Yes, I get that distinction, and it's an important one!

@Rastal @konkrit "The whole purpose of quotes is not to reply. It serves no other function."

You are right; but there are many legitimate reasons to want not to reply.

@konkrit @mike The demographics of #Mastodon - and the #Fediverse - are not particularly diverse, and mostly reflect white Europeans and North Americans (with the main exception being Japanese #Misskey users).

This is not good, and if we can change our underlying technology (*) to make Mastodon attractive to people outside of these groups, then in my opinion we should do so. The revolution will not be successful if it is not global.

(*) Of course, we also need to implement _cultural_ changes to make the Fediverse more attractive to non-white demographics - there is only so much that technology on its own can do.

@konkrit
My primary use-case is taking an English-language post as a starting-point for a post in Norwegian. Don't want to clutter up a thread with my local issues.. @mike
@konkrit E.g. I'd like to point to this https://chaos.social/@slothrop/114012895448744803 and say "Vi trenger en debatt om norsk medlemskap i EU NÅ ! " @qmike@sauropods.win
Rocketman (@slothrop@chaos.social)

Attached: 1 image · Content warning: EUpol USpol

chaos.social

@konkrit @mike Automating quote posting allows adding **Context** to blindly Boosting somebody else's Post/Boost. It's like ALT text for Boosts.

It will allow ME to add Content Warning wrappers around other people's posts that didn't, reducing Boost spammage.

I currently hate Following on Mastodon because it conflates Network spread via Boost with "I want to explain somebody's post". I can't separate the two.

Also, manual copy-pasting linkage is Luddite. Drove the Journalists away.

@konkrit @mike Now I've had to double post because Mastodon.

I needed to add context to a Post so made a new Post, added my context, pasted link to OP in my Post, and sent it off.

But that won't Mastodon-network Boost the Post so I have to Boost the OP. But I can't make the Boost Unlisted or something like that.

Anybody following get double-spammed. Scale this up with a lot of followers or following.

Black Twitter, quoting, and white views of toxicity on Mastodon

Does quoting really cause toxicity?

The Nexus Of Privacy
@konkrit @MastodonEngineering i loathe quotes, almost universally used to steal glory from the original poster by saying "look at this" rather than boosting.
Only about 5% are used with any integrity imo
So I'll be opting out .

@Tattooed_Mummy @konkrit @MastodonEngineering

Is also worth keeping in mind that one can also turn off boosts by individual users, so while boosting is nice, it’s not a ‘foolproof’ way to get followers to see something. Same as if they do not follow the original poster, that will not see your replies to them.

But boosting a post with commentary is a great way to ensure fillers will not only see the post but your thoughts as well

1/2

@Tattooed_Mummy @konkrit @MastodonEngineering

One of my favorite ways to use it is to boost art and my thoughts on how it makes me feel and why i like it, rather than contextless reposting.

Another use is when the post inspired thoughts that are only tangentially related, or long and rambling, that might not really fit in the op’s replies, but you want to include the op for context.

@Alien_Sunset Apologies, but I'll do a very meta thing here by only posting a link in response to the last point you've made: https://mastodon.social/@konkrit/114003374263145704

@konkrit

but if the post you are making is not 100% related but only referencing the quoted post for context, the reader then has to navigate BACK to your post to be able to continue the conversation.

i know of many people that get very annoyed when people create tangents in their replies that aren't strictly related to their posts, muddying the conversational waters and blowing up their mentions with stuff they don't care about. this is a way to keep that from happening.