If you are an American married woman (or any gender person who has changed their surname legally) you need to be aware of this NOW. You may lose your right to vote if you don’t prepare. https://www.glamour.com/story/save-act-could-stop-millions-women-voting

Not an exaggeration, not hyperbole. Millions of people, mostly women, turned away to vote.

The SAVE Act, Which Could Stop Millions of Women From Voting, Just Passed in the House

The SAVE Act in Congress and its potential impact on women and other marginalized groups—a detailed explainer.

Glamour

@hacks4pancakes so:

Trump 1.0 :: Teen Vogue
Trump 2.0 :: Glamour

?

Excellent.

@gwync @hacks4pancakes Teen Vogue's still at it though. ICE has apparently been *very* frustrated by people knowing their and their neighbors' rights.
@hacks4pancakes And I thought they just wanted to go back to the 1950s…
@hacks4pancakes
The "Save Act" will only save white, election denying racist from having to count women & non-caucasians as actual voting eligible citizens.
@hacks4pancakes Well, hell, if their "populism" explosion continues, and this keeps more MAGA idiots from voting ... ? ;)
@WeirdXmas Sadly, women vote slightly more liberal than men, especially young women. And these laws will impact everyone, even in blue states with good voter protections.
@hacks4pancakes @WeirdXmas Married people vote more conservative than single people and the gap among women is bigger than among men, plus among married women the more conservative ones are more likely to change their names, so the effect on married women is Republicans shooting themselves in the foot, but the bill is horrible. The effect on people with disabilities of having to apply in person barely gets mentioned but it's huge, plus strong correlation between wealth & access to documents.

@hacks4pancakes

Thank you for sharing this info. I had not heard of this before.

@hacks4pancakes This is not just a "be aware" situation; this is a "call and annoy your elected officials, STAT" situation. https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative
Find Your Representative | house.gov

@hacks4pancakes Another reason I'm glad I didn't take my husband's name! Mainly I didn't want to deal with the paperwork

@hacks4pancakes

A good moment for me to make my (generally futile) reminder that a #MarriedName is an #AdoptedName / #AssumedName that is recognised by tradition and convention, and is not the same as a #LegalName.

If one obtains a #LegalChangeOfName there are additional filings (and sometimes fees, affadavits, etc) with the local #VitalStats / #Registries office, which will also result in an amendment to the name on any #BirthCertificates issued thereafter.

@likelyjanlukas @hacks4pancakes I have NOT seen US counties ( specifically Sangamon & Cook, Illinois) in Illinois back record name changes to birth certificate records for marital events. In the US, a marriage certificate and divorce decrees will count for legal name change purposes, and US state and federal IDs can be changed based on marriage/divorce decrees. If you process a name change outside of marriage, that’s a different ball of wax.
@likelyjanlukas @hacks4pancakes Additional complexity will be added because states could refuse to recognize Non-Real ID state identification, and/or require recertification if you are coming from a blue state to a red state. Sure you could use a passport, but not everyone will update their US passport right after marriage/divorce if they even have one. It’s a bill to fight an imaginary problem and create a very real barrier to voting for others.

@SteamDieselEV

I apologise that I don't have an exact cite at hand, but I recall learning about things such as inter-operability agreements (for provincial/territorial/state drivers' licenses) that apply across the USA and Canada.

And those documents in turn rely on foundational ID documents such as #BirthCertificates, #CitizenshipCertificates, etc.

IIRC this is a treaty-level agreement so not simple to ignore.

@hacks4pancakes

@likelyjanlukas
Respectfully, this administration and those of red states have little respect for international treaties.

Specifically, this SAVE act is wholly focused on US voting eligibility, and finding any reason to restrict it to anyone whose documents are not in order.

I respect your research. Those in power are looking to use “common sense” as an excuse to disregard any buried legal nuance. They will demand all these documents line up as a barrier.

@hacks4pancakes

@SteamDieselEV

Correct. Names on birth certificates are only amended after a legal change of name process (whether a paperwork application or court process).

I mention my reminder is 'usually futile' because yes, married people *are* typically granted use of marital names *as if they are* legal names, but if you read a jurisdiction's documentation, they normally distinguish between recognising assumed (married) and legal names.

@hacks4pancakes

There was a video AOC put out earlier this week. She mentioned that ppl who watch the fake Fox news call/contact their reps about an average of 8 times more than any other party. The contact/calls measure the public motivation....meaning more motivated voters come election time. She also mentioned if you're in a red state our voices matter the most. I have been making calls all week to all my GOP (🤮) reps. I use the scripts from 5 calls.

https://5calls.org/

5 Calls

Spend 5 minutes. Make 5 calls. Make your voice heard.

5 Calls
@themelissadamas Me too...I do 5 calls a day and today I made 10 calls and could not get through... that made me happy...

@hacks4pancakes Gerrymandering but next next level and on personal level.

What’s the most legal way to start a facial regime? Prevent people with wrong opinions to vote via legal changes. And interpret laws in a way that a president is immune regardless what they do at the office. (Remember how one president was on trial over having sex at the office - those were the days I miss, that was much much closer the level of accountability governing should have. )

@rpsu Things happen in just muted enough drastic changes that people can normalize it while being traumatized and just get lost in sports or movies or whatever

@hacks4pancakes

Republicans have been working on disenfranchisement schemes for decades.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/john-roberts-voting-rights-act-121222/

Bradley Foundation funded the overturn of the Voting Rights Act by corrupt Supreme Court Justice John Roberts.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/race-mass-incarceration-and-disastrous-war-drugs

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/nation/50-year-war-on-drugs-imprisoned-millions-of-black-americans

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony_disenfranchisement_in_the_United_States

The "War on Drugs" was a mass incarceration & felony disenfranchisement scheme targeting black & brown voters. Over 7 million Americans can't vote as a result.

https://www.propublica.org/article/dark-money-leonard-leo-barre-seid

1/3

2/3

Barre Seid funded a $1.6 billion campaign to overturn Roe vs Wade.
The GOP are well underway to making contraception & abortion into another mass felony disenfranchisement scheme.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/10/ramaswamy-raise-voting-age-00096266

The GOP wants to raise the voting age to disenfranchise the young.

https://www.propublica.org/article/league-of-women-voters-gop-trump
The GOP spurns the League of Women Voters.

https://www.businessinsider.com/this-is-what-the-election-map-would-look-like-if-just-men-voted-on-election-day-2016-10

https://www.newsweek.com/ann-coulter-reconsiders-womens-right-vote-after-republicans-comments-1851806

GOP shills like Nate Silver & Ann Coulter promote lies that universal suffrage ruined America.

Vivek Ramaswamy wants to raise the voting age. Even his staff doesn’t like the idea.

The youngest candidate in the Republican presidential field is preparing to announce a proposal to raise the voting age to 25 for most people.

POLITICO
@hacks4pancakes the freaking GOP in control of the house and senate don’t give a crap what we think. If they did they Wouldn’t be voting in all the stupid insane cabinet and dept heads. This was a good article until the “ do we panic”. Their advice won’t do nothin. Cause these old shit s don’t care about us. The game is rigged. We can only try to make life better for those around us… and stand up to local bullies… this is where we have a chance to actually make difference.
@littlescraps @hacks4pancakes “ Luckily, for the time being at least, we still live in a democracy” 🤦🏻‍♀️
@hacks4pancakes I'm seeing lots of folks saying that there's nothing in the text of the bill that says a driver's license with your married name won't work.
I invite you to go look at your driver's license & then come back & tell us which line states your citizenship status or place of birth.
"Nowhere" = good guess.
If you're a married woman who took her spouse's last name, birth certificate won't help. #SAVEAct
@sarah_geri Real ID may, depending on how they play it, but that has costs and requirements associated with it, too.
@hacks4pancakes REAL ID, as developed in my state anyway (AL) doesn't include that info (and btw I don't have the docs to get THAT, either, bc ex hubs has my birth & marriage certificates). Text of bill says ID has to match REAL ID requirements *and also* state U.S. citizenship. None of the examples I've seen so far do that; maybe somewhere??
@sarah_geri Nor I. I am being as giving as I can, too.

@sarah_geri @hacks4pancakes

Have you tried getting official copies of the documents that your ex has?

@KnitAFett @hacks4pancakes Expensive. I haven't given up, but it's a lengthy process that takes money, so as important as it is it hasn't been as urgent as getting my phone turned back on (nonpayment) and my electricity covered and my ass not evicted.
States set their own documentation requirements; not fully clear in AL whether certified copies will count, but my best shot.
My ex would give me the docs but he doesn't know where they are. 🤦‍♀️

@sarah_geri @hacks4pancakes REAL ID in Illinois just adds a star and removes some text.

https://realid.ilsos.gov/

@JTO_is_Typing @hacks4pancakes Doesn't look like that includes information about birthplace or citizenship anywhere. Which makes sense, given DLs don't have a whole lot of real estate, but is going to make the #SAVEAct as written pretty difficult for the states to manage - and that's over and above everything that's wrong with it from a #VotingRights point of view.

@sarah_geri @hacks4pancakes In 2020 I also had the opinion that the relaxed rules for implementing it effectively made you a Sneetch.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sneetches_and_Other_Stories

The Sneetches and Other Stories - Wikipedia

@JTO_is_Typing @hacks4pancakes I've never really understood how adding a star was supposed to make us safer. I suppose they're supposed to have a more rigorous vetting process, but GOOD LORD.
I have additional issues besides the maiden name bc when I CHANGED my name the first time, it didn't get registered properly, and then when I went to the SS office to fix it, they changed my middle name (not to my maiden name, but to an initial). It's been 20+ years, still causes problems.
Before you continue to YouTube

@wagesj45 @hacks4pancakes
> But the SAVE Act requires the person also submits “other evidence” to election officials to prove that they’re a U.S. citizen.
>The Election Assistance Commission and the individual states would determine what “other evidence” a person could use to prove their citizenship.

IOW, “the right sort of evidence, from the right sort of people.” Chip Roy just introduced Jim Crow, part 2.

@hacks4pancakes nice....sounds as if the US want to roll back the time to the 1746... Nice. Sisters stand against it!!!
@hacks4pancakes remove women voting rights thru the back door

@hacks4pancakes - so much of American law around elections and the right to vote are so anti-democratic. The almost standard registration in preparation for every election is an senseless barrier to voters.

How can a country that works so actively to discourage or disallow eligible people to vote be considered a legitimate democracy?

@hacks4pancakes

Here in AUS we are sent a letter by the government just before we turn 18 and told to register to vote. Completing the form completes registration to vote in all three levels of government - Local government, State Government and Federal Government. Once that is done the only time you need to renew is to change details when you marry or move to a different address.

@hacks4pancakes Voter ID is pretty much standard in Europe. So by that logic I'll guess all of EU and Europe is fascism then.
@Apan don’t be obtuse. This isn’t a standard ID issued by the government. It’s a purposeful, sudden change with costs associated with it designed to disenfranchise voters.

@hacks4pancakes love how the “we should leave things to the States” people immediately propose stripping power from States when they have Federal control. And it’s always about maintaining that control, never about trying to make people more free or better their lives.

@szakib

@hacks4pancakes

If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal. They've already rendered it pointless.

The choice between a genocidal maniac and a bigger genocidal maniac shouldn't be seen as a real choice.

@hacks4pancakes I just helped an elderly relative sign up for "Real ID" before the May deadline. She was hung up on not being able to prove the name change at marriage, and had to order a copy of the marriage license. Real ID requires that you document the chain of changes; it sounds like this bill requires an exact match with specific documents. Real ID is a federal law and obviously the people behind this bill know it exists, but "somehow", this bill has stronger requirements anyway. It's "SAVE"ing something, but not what it declares on the tin. :-(

@hacks4pancakes another thing that applies specifically to many elderly and disabled folks: my relative is not online, at all. She never learned how; my father of blessed memory handled anything that had to be done online. She does everything by either mail or in-person visits (for example to her local bank). Some disabilities also impede online navigation, especially given the crappy state of accessibility in some corners of the Internet.

People in this position will, with this bill, need to do a lot more running around physically in order to meet the prereqs before they can (again) run around to handle voter registration in person. Some of that running around will need to be through programs like ACCESS. Quite the burden! Does this bill have provisions for assisting people in getting those documents? Yeah, I thought not. Quite ridiculous when people already *have* authenticated ID (that they might have to show when voting).

@monica @hacks4pancakes

when i got my ReadID i had to get paperwork from counties i hadn't lived in for decades it took weeks to gather the paperwork

@samiamsam @hacks4pancakes when I got married I said "why would I give up my name?" and my husband agreed this made no sense. I wasn't even thinking about the paperwork challenges I was dodging by making that decision!