[P] In other thoughts... I'm glad I'm not the only one who's noticed that D&D 5.5's art looks really off. I've become accustomed to having to spot AI "art" and it's fairly egregious here. Monster Manual art especially looks very AI-y. It has vibes of prompts for "unique ideas," which AI isn't designed for—so it just stuffs random elements in there. I'm not a fan. Pathfinder at least pays artists, quite obviously as their books continue to be pretty.

#dungeonsanddragons #dnd55e #onednd

-1

[P] If "art" is having as much issue with context as these are, with this level of fidelity? It's 100 per cent AI. I haven't seen a single example yet where I'm convinced a human made it. So, I guess this is how WOTC is raking in the money now. I'm not the only one to notice that the rendered dragons don't properly match their profile refs at all. They just look painted over a bit to be "close enough." Bleh. Well, at least PF isn't using AI art (for now).

#dungeonsanddragons #dnd55e #onednd

-6