@rl_dane @solusspider @joel @dm @sotolf @thedoctor @pixx @twizzay @orbitalmartian @adamsdesk @krafter @roguefoam @clayton
I disagree that everything is political.
Politics, I argue, is almost more like a way of talking about things, like a proxy or symbolism; An abstraction.
Abstractions are _absolutely_ helpful, nay, necessary. All of language is an abstraction. But not all languages are equally good at expressing all things. And this is true of all abstractions, like sort of meta-languages.
Sciences, for example, are very big on these meta-languages. What the average person means by a word is likely not what a software engineer means by a word is certainly not what a biologist means by a word.
And thus is politics. It is supposed to be a meta-language for talking about societal issues. But just as a biologist and a software engineer have totally different goals despite both being scientists, there are many people with many different goals in politics.
A common language, as helpful and desirable as it is, is also impossible. Nothing can truly be all things to all people.
Thus politics is just _a way_ to talk about things, and often _not a helpful way_