Elizabeth Laraki (@elizlaraki) on X

I'm talking at a conference later this year (on UX+AI). I just saw an ad for the conference with my photo and was like, wait, that doesn't look right. Is my bra showing in my profile pic and I've never noticed...? That's weird. I open my original photo. No bra showing. I put

X (formerly Twitter)

Nebenaspekt der Story: Eigentlich hatte das Originalfoto ja den gewünschten Bildausschnitt. Ich vermute, dass an einer Stelle das Bild beschnitten wurde und an einer anderen Stelle plötzlich ein anderes Bildformat gewünscht wurde.

Das ist unsinnig und damit wohl der künftig vorherrschende Einsatz von KI: Unnötige Aufgaben schaffen und hoffen, dass nicht allzu schief geht.

@publictorsten das musst du nicht vermuten, das steht da genau so
@fl0_id @publictorsten das prinzipielle Problem ist nicht so ungewöhnlich/unüblich: Person A bekommt das Foto übermittelt für die Webseite, schneidet es auf ein Format zu und legt das Original entweder gar nicht ab oder in einer unüberblickbaren Struktur. Person B, die Social Media macht, bekommt das Original gar nicht zu sehen. Das sind Orga-Probleme, die du so in den meisten größeren Organisationen finden wirst.
@publictorsten vor zwei Jahren so: „Leute wer hat das Pornhub Fullbackup auf die Platte mit den Model Trainingdaten gelegt?“
@publictorsten ein weiterer typischer wtf Moment
@publictorsten pretty poor that in examining the photo she didn't notice this and think, oops, not like that.

@publictorsten What is so shocking about this is *not* that the genAI did exactly what it is designed to do, namely create teh most likely looking image, but that the person who used it switched off their brain at the sight of the words 'AI'.

Before AI, if a social media person had had to do a major edit of a photo which left them deciding 'bra or no bra', they would have asked the sitter. Now they use genAI to be 'more productive', they stop doing their own job properly.

@tomstoneham @publictorsten I am noticing this a lot: GenAI being used as an excuse/accelerator for a massive erosion of professionalism, with the excuse of “increased productivity” (“getting things done”).
@klmr @tomstoneham @publictorsten That seems to be what it's made for: Productivity without responsibility.

@klmr @tomstoneham @publictorsten

This is in keeping with the TechBro mantra, "Move fast and break things."

Which is how we have quickly gotten to a world full of broken things.

@klmr @tomstoneham @publictorsten
That's my favorite joke from the long-pre-AI typewriter era:
HR asking a candidate for a secretary position on an interview:
You write in your resume that you can type 1250 words per minute. That's a lot. How did you achieve this?
-That was rather easy, I just don't care what gibberish is the result.
@publictorsten Side note: "respectable guy with 5 kids at home", dafuq?
@texttheater He's not a childless cat man. And now we know what that can communicate about men.
@publictorsten kinda sad that AI is now trying to undress us all :P
@publictorsten It's wild what proprietary softwareland is getting up to these days.

@publictorsten

It is almost assuredly no coincidence that the kind of information that ML model was trained on also happens to reflect the viewpoints of the many toxic people who are (organizational) 'Leaders' in this area

https://mastodon.social/@publictorsten/113315998059621041

@publictorsten that's.... certainly an informative presentation on UX + AI!
@publictorsten AI. Fucking everything up for years.
@publictorsten @EricLawton What the actual fuck?!? I’ll add that one of my proudest moments was when Elizabeth spoke at Fluxible, and did so with her recently-born baby in a carrier strapped to her front. As someone who has organized UX events, it’s profoundly disappointing to see that this photo shit happened to such a wonderful person.
An AI-generated image of a Victorian MP raises wider questions on digital ethics

A graphics expert says Nine News's explanation for how a digitally altered photo of Victorian Animal Rights Party MP Georgie Purcell was put to air is plausible — and raises important questions over the way the technology is used across society.

ABC News

@publictorsten
@Kishi

So programmers have taught AI male gaze?

@hellomiakoda @publictorsten @Kishi Jesus.

The expression in your profile pic really summarizes what should be the general response to this news. 😒

This makes me wonder where they got their training material.
@publictorsten the unethical nature of this stupid technology on full display here.
@publictorsten "I didn't think the leopards would eat MY face!" - Person who works with and for the leopards
@publictorsten ugh. Bad AI, but also bad human for not looking and thinking it doesn't look right!
@publictorsten if this is real… #genAI is amazing. It just gave you the story for your talk!