What should journalists do when the facts don’t matter?

Media historian Michael J. Socolow explores this rather bleak question for @ConversationUS. He argues that while not perfect, the American media largely did its job this year.

"Ultimately, the First Amendment protects the right of journalists to report, publish and broadcast, but it can’t force citizens to read, listen, absorb or learn. In that sense, journalism didn’t fail us – we failed journalism."

https://flip.it/W3zSjG

How do you think the media performed? And tell us why in a reply.

#Media #Journalism #Facts #USPolitics #USElection #Trump

Largely did its job
2.1%
Failed, terribly
75.2%
Mixed report card
21.4%
Other (explain in reply)
1.3%
Poll ended at .
What should journalists do when the facts don’t matter?

Historical examples abound of American news consumers being presented with verified facts about controversial figures or events, only to have the excellent journalism have little to no effect.

The Conversation
@NewsDesk @ConversationUS

> "In that sense, journalism didn’t fail us – we failed journalism."

lmfaooooooooo yeah okay, PLEASE try shoveling that sneering condescension from feckless "journalists" somewhere else. as if.

Americans' trust in legacy media is lower than the deepest darkest recesses of the sewer, because legacy media EARNED IT. #CrisisInJournalism