DHS foiled a terrorist plot targeting #ElectionDay.

Note his plan to purchase "500 rounds of ammunition". I've LONG advocated for a #GunpowderTax raising the cost to around $100/bullet (not unreasonable to if it's to protect your family.)

"500 rounds" would have cost him $50,000... which unlikely would not have been able to afford, and would have raised red flags if he had. #TaxGunpowder #TaxCordite #ThinkOutsideTheBox

@MugsysRapSheet Making gun owners have to have insurance for each weapon will help, too. No insurance? Weapon confiscated. No. You don’t get it back.

@Catawu
"Insurance" would never withstand a #Constitutional challenge. No insurance company would be granted the power to deny you a Constitutional Right.

Like I wrote: You have a right to a weapon. NOT "an endless supply of cheap ammunition".

@MugsysRapSheet There is no constitutional “Right” to a weapon. That’s a drastic but common misreading of the 2A. But do carry on.

@Catawu
Regardless of how you believe the 2A to mean something other than what MILLIONS of gun nuts (and the #SCotUS) have defined it as, that IS the generally accepted meaning: "Your right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Period."

Arguing "that's not what they meant" is irrelevant. That's what they've decided it says. 😞

@MugsysRapSheet Millions of people believed the earth was flat. Millions believed the sun rotated around the the earth. The truth is what we base it on. The people who have been misled should learn to read and comprehend. It doesn’t say what you put in quotes. That’s from the NRA propaganda. Now, make them insure their weapons of war or get rid of them. We’re done here.

@Catawu
It took the world several thousand years to accept that the world is round and the Earth rotated around the Sun.

I don't think we have that kind of time. 😐

@MugsysRapSheet Doesn’t matter how much ‘time’ you have. Facts don’t change. Truth doesn’t change. Fight for what is true or go play in someone else’s TL

@Catawu
"It doesn’t say what you put in quotes."

It certainly does. I'm not arguing that the INTERPRETATION is right. I'm arguing that as long as 2A absolutists believe it, no law abridging it would withstand a Constitutional challenge.

@MugsysRapSheet I don’t care what they ‘believe’. They are not ‘absolutists’, they are fanatics and they are wrong.
@MugsysRapSheet Cherry picking an incomplete phrase is how the NRA made us a shooting gallery. The 2A has a lot more to say than that. It defines the purpose and the regulations. Please stop. You’re either cheering on the slaughter, justifying it, or saying it’s impossible to stop, because it’s the 2A. Move on to flame throwers, tanks, nukes for that string of logic. But just leave me the fuck out of it.

@Catawu
You STILL don't get that I agree with you.

BUT that is NOT how THIS SCotUS (or ANY SCotUS of the last 200 years) has interpreted the 2A.

If you believe your best bet for immediate change is to challenge T**** Court, more power to you. #FoolsErrand

@MugsysRapSheet And Supreme Court gets it wrong from time to time. They are not infallible. See Dred Scott
@Catawu
Do you HONESTLY see THIS SCotUS changing course on the Second Amendment? 🤔
@MugsysRapSheet Do you HONESTLY see me haggling this theoretical war with you much further? Go argue with someone else. I have much better ways to spend my time.
@Catawu
*I* am not who decided to argue with one of your posts.