@mozilla pathetic

@rail_
Mozilla is such a terrible company, really sucks that they are the only alternative to chromium based browsers, and they still suck as a company.

This is why we need a community maintained browser, something that is made by the community and for the community. Where those maintaining it aren't insulated from the community's wishes. Mozilla is insulated from them and that's a big problem for the future of Firefox, and anything else they make.

@mozilla

@Draconic_NEO @rail_ @mozilla You mean like #palemoonbrowser ?

Edit: This was meant as lighthearted trolling, but seems to have escalated quickly, given the replies. 😐

@farbenstau @Draconic_NEO @rail_ @mozilla Sort of, but Pale Moon still leans on Firefox at least for security patches.
@Draconic_NEO @rail_ @mozilla yea, we need a new engine asap! Firefox is doomed with ads, tracking and AI

@Draconic_NEO

My primary #FediRez is Universeodon … but my browser, #Vivaldi, provides a 2nd-ary.

https://social.vivaldi.net/about

cc: @rail_ @mozilla

Vivaldi Social

Vivaldi Social is part of the Mastodon network and is hosted in Iceland by the makers of Vivaldi Browser. Everyone is welcome to join.

Mastodon hosted on Vivaldi Social

@drakakis @Draconic_NEO @rail_ @mozilla

Vivaldi is just a chromium fork and it's not even open source so it's not at all what we need. We need an open source engine that is not based on chromium, #servo sounds like it could be it, but it still needs a lot of work

@gloopsies @drakakis @Draconic_NEO @rail_ @mozilla So? Still works better than Firefox. *And* they run a mastodon instance.

Can Mozilla do that? Evidently they cannot.

@carighan @gloopsies @drakakis @Draconic_NEO @rail_ @mozilla

just to offer up my two cents: it shouldn't be a web browser's place to host a mastodon instance. fedi instances should be owned and operated mostly by individuals or small teams, not big companies— thats kinda the whole point.

so whether the company behind a web browser can maintain a fedi instance or not seems irrelevant to me.

@krafter @gloopsies @drakakis @Draconic_NEO @rail_ @mozilla Yeah that's a good point, fair enough. I mean it was kinda nice of them to do, but there's a conceptual difference between "Being present on a microblogging service" (i.e.: posting news there) and "Being part of a microblogging service" by hosting part of its infrastructure.

You're right. I want them to post news here, it doesn't matter either way whether they also provide an instance. 🤔

@carighan @mozilla

Why do you want your browser vendor to host a Mastodon instance? In what ways do you find Vivaldi better?

@mikael @mozilla No, and hrm last I tried it, it was faster, felt cleaner, and had an actual tablet interface including keyboard-shortcuts and all.

But that's a pretty minor thing, and I ended up dropping it again. And likewise, whether Mozilla runs a Mastodon instance or not is a super minor thing. I guess I'm just surprised that it's apparently a noteworthy investment to be cut down. 🤷

@gloopsies @drakakis @Draconic_NEO @rail_ @mozilla

Isn't Servo a Mozilla project, though? At least originally?

@amin @gloopsies @drakakis @Draconic_NEO @rail_ @mozilla it was, until they abandoned it and summarily fired the entire team, who went to the Linux Foundation https://servo.org/blog/2020/11/17/servo-home/
Servo’s new home - Servo, the embeddable, independent, memory-safe, modular, parallel web rendering engine

Servo has left the Mozilla nest.

Servo
@amin @gloopsies @drakakis @Draconic_NEO @rail_ @mozilla originally, yes. but mozilla has 0 involvement anymore after they fired all the servo staff during one of their budget cuts.

@gloopsies
Even so he makes a good point, they are able to have their own instance so there's no real reason why Mozilla couldn't also have their own, at the very least have it be reserved just for brand accounts like social.bbc (yeah I know they aren't good but at least they're trying, unlike mozilla).

@drakakis
@rail_
@mozilla

BBC Mastodon

This is an experimental Mastodon instance run by BBC Research and Development.

Mastodon hosted on social.bbc
@Draconic_NEO
What do you say? Mozilla is a good "company". I use Firefox and Thunderbird as default and it works. I don't know why you say it. It is so sad for hear it.
@rail_ @[email protected]

@the_ilmfurter
Maybe because they've been trying to start an advertising company, because they've been investing crazy into the AI bubble (and it is a bubble).

I don't deny that Firefox and Thunderbird are fantastic, the question is will they stay that way with Mozilla's current direction or will they be pumped full of AI trash and advertising. Not to say that will happen but it is a possibility, as well as the possibility they will screw us over in a future manifest version like Google did.

These are the consequences of Mozilla's decline. Hopefully they don't because there isn't much else, and currently isn't any kind of community effort to build our own browser. They're the best there is.

@rail_ @mozilla

@Draconic_NEO @the_ilmfurter @rail_ @mozilla I strongly disagree about AI, as the new on-device translation feature is great. I finally don't have to send everything to Google for translation. I can translate it privately in Firefox.

@elgregor
You are in a minority, while I do agree that translation services can be useful, a chatbot is not something that should be integrated into a browser like on the later nightlies, something that will likely make its way into stable Firefox.
It is a waste of money and resources better spent on maintaining and improving Firefox, not chasing the AI trend.

@the_ilmfurter @rail_ @mozilla

@Draconic_NEO @rail_ @mozilla I am very much looking forward to https://ladybird.org/
Ladybird

Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, backed by a non-profit.

@rhoot @Draconic_NEO @rail_ @mozilla It would be better to have a project that isn't maintained by bigots.

@shine
Wait I'm confused are we talking about Palemoon or ladybird? I know Palemoon has bigotry issues but I'm not aware of any with Ladybird.

@rhoot
@rail_
@mozilla

@Draconic_NEO @rhoot @rail_ @mozilla https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/pull/6814#issuecomment-830793992

Considering gender neutral language in documentation "too political" certainly isn't a good look

Gender neutral language within build instructions by Tunas1337 · Pull Request #6814 · SerenityOS/serenity

It's a minor nitpick, but I think it's important; assuming the user and/or developer of the operating system is male isn't exactly the best.

GitHub
Well, it's pretty much only left wingers pushing for "gender neutral language" which DOES make it political.

It's one thing to refer to somebody as a "bigot" when they have opposing political ideas to you that makes you believe they are a bigot.

But Ladybird does not take any political stances and as a software project, there is no reason why it should (regardless of whether it would be left wing, right wing, centrist, etc. ideas) instead of focusing on building open source software.

I can assure you that the Ladybird software is built by people with diverse political backgrounds, some of whom you might completely agree with on everything, others you might think are "bigots". But whatever those people believe, it's their personal stances and the project itself does not have any political stance.
@rick @rail_ @rhoot @mozilla @Draconic_NEO Ah right, the famous two genders again. "Male" and "Political"
@shine @rail_ @mozilla @Draconic_NEO @rhoot @rick no political stance as in, my existence is up for debate.
Nobody is questioning either your existence or your gender. I can assure you if you go report an issue to the developers they are not going to be like "we won't fix this because this person is doesn't exist, it must be an AI" and I also doubt they would handle the response differently based on what your gender is.

The Ladybird devs also have stated that they do not have any problem with "gender neutral language". The reason that particular issue was closed is because it came from a political activist, and they do not want people contributing to the project only for political reasons, as they do not want to take a political stance as the project. That being said, if another regular contributor would have contributed the same changes, it would have been welcome.
Not sure why you specifically pick out "Male". It's quite common in documentations to refers to "users" as "her" also "Alice and Bob"

@venthewolf
LibreWolf is good, but it's hard to say if they would be able to keep up if Mozilla started making extra evil changes to Firefox as a browser, as well as more aggressive policing of the AMO repository.

At the moment it is the best we have, but it would be better to be independent from Mozilla especially as they continue to progressively get worse.

@rail_ @mozilla

@Draconic_NEO @venthewolf @rail_ @mozilla I’ve been recommending Vivaldi just in case. I use Zen which is forked from Firefox, but if Mozilla goes kaput then who knows what’ll happen to the forks.
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] Hearing those things. I hope servo will become a thing

@venthewolf @Draconic_NEO @rail_ AFAIK it's under the Linux Foundation's wing right now. The people here donating to Mozilla should really divert their money to Servo instead.

https://servo.org/sponsorship/

Sponsorship - Servo aims to empower developers with a lightweight, high-performance alternative for embedding web technologies in applications.

Servo is a web rendering engine written in Rust, with WebGL and WebGPU support, and adaptable to desktop, mobile, and embedded applications.

Servo
@Draconic_NEO @rail_ @mozilla
Love idea of community-maintained browser. But what's so bad about Mozilla? Can you explain or send links on that?
Ladybird

Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, backed by a non-profit.