Madiba K. Dennie argues that “originalism deliberately entombs historically #marginalized groups’ #legal claims to #liberation” #SCOTUS #law #nonfiction #books
https://www.washingtonpost.com/books/2024/07/19/originalism-trap-madiba-k-dennie-review/
One of the more striking questions raised by #SCOTUS’ controversial recent decisions—such as its partial shielding of #Trump from #criminal liability for his efforts to overturn the legitimate result of the 2020 pres election—is how they square w/the court’s embrace of #originalism as a theory of constitutional interpretation. The court’s #immunity decision…was mainly non-originalist in its reasoning, despite the fact that 7 justices…have shown some affinity for originalist interpretation.
#Originalism is the assertion that judges should be guided & limited in interpreting the #Constitution solely by something original in it, although that “something” has shifted over time — from the original #intent of its #framers, to the original public #meaning of its text, to the original #law at the time of its adoption, w/various sub-theories now debated. The theory has been sharply criticized.
In “The #Originalism Trap: How #Extremists Stole the #Constitution & How We the People Can Take It Back,” Madiba K. Dennie, a #CivilRights lawyer & #legal commentator, offers a trenchant, sharply worded critique of originalist theories — & a call for a popular revolt against them. This is a timely project given that the number of #SCOTUS justices who espouse such theories could increase if #Trump is elected to the White House again this fall.
The mask is off
All that #Textualism and #Originalism and high-minded-sounding #OriginalIntent schtick was a premeditated #Federalist / #GOP lie
The Constitution is now open to interpretation that is entirely fluid, situational, and expedient
Any position taken by the #Republican party is subject to alteration or erasure as needed, as situations change
It's far right #SCOTUS #ActivistJudges all the way down from here on out