#SCOTUS retains full #access to key #AbortionMedication #mifepristone

The #SupremeCourt on Thurs refused to limit access to a widely used #abortion #medication, rejecting a challenge from #antiabortion doctors 2 years after the court’s #conservative majority overturned #RoeVWade on procedural grounds.

#law #ReproductiveRights #FDA #medicine #medical #health #WomensHealth
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/06/13/supreme-court-abortion-pill-ruling-mifepristone/

Supreme Court upholds broad access to key abortion pill mifepristone

Ever since the high court eliminated the right to abortion in 2022, medications to terminate pregnancy have grown in importance and been challenged in court.

The Washington Post

In a #unanimous ruling, #SCOTUS sided w/the #Biden admin & the manufacturer of #mifepristone, & reversed a lower court decision that would have made it more difficult to obtain the drug used in >60% of #US #abortions. The ruling was not on the substance of the case, but on a procedural ruling the plaintiffs did not have #standing to bring the case.

#law #ReproductiveRights #FDA #medicine #medical #health #WomensHealth

Since #SCOTUS eliminated the #right to #abortion in 2022, #medications to terminate pregnancy have increased in importance & become a major target of #litigation, in part because the pills can be sent by mail including to states that have severely limited or banned #abortions.
The justices were reviewing a decision from #conservative #5thCircuit that said the #FDA failed to follow proper procedures or explain its reasoning when it loosened #regulations for obtaining #mifepristone in 2016 & 2021.

In advance of oral argument in March, hundreds of #pharmaceutical companies & former #FDA ofcls warned #SCOTUS not to second-guess #scientific #experts & said a ruling against FDA would destabilize the #regulatory system & jeopardize investments in #research & #innovation.

Most of the questions from the justices at argument centered on whether the #antiabortion challengers had a #legal right –or #standing – to file. Lawyers defending the drug said the plaintiffs were not directly #harmed.

#law

Individual #physicians & the #AHM filed suit in Amarillo, #Texas, where the ONLY sitting Dist Court #judge is #MatthewKacsmaryk, a #Trump appointee known for longstanding opposition to #abortion. [+ #evangelical #Christian activist #judicial opinions]
#Kacsmaryk’s 2023 ruling would have removed the #medication from the market, but the #5thCircuit scaled it back. It was the first time a judge suspended longtime approval of a medication despite oppo from the #FDA & the manufacturer.

#law #SCOTUS

🚨🚨🚨 #SCOTUS Justice #ClarenceThomas agreed with the ruling but filed a concurrence CHALLENGING the Court's THIRD PARTY STANDING DOCTRINE--the doctrine that allowed #AbortionProviders to file #lawsuits challenging #abortion #laws on behalf of their #patients.

This OPENS the door to further litigation. Concurring opinions even dissenting opinions are considered #legal #PersuasiveAuthority & can be cited in subsequent cases.

#law

The decision turned on #standing, a doctrine grounded in the #Constitution’s req that fed courts decide only concrete claims.

The standing req can leave a gap. It means, Justice Kavanaugh wrote,”that the federal courts may never need to decide some contested #legal questions.”

Justice #Kavanaugh relies on #ConscienceProtections in fed #law, saying #doctors “shall not be required to provide treatment or assistance that would violate the doctors’ religious beliefs or moral convictions.”

#SCOTUS

#SCOTUS’ decision will fuel efforts on the #antiabortion side to restrict #abortion #medication in other ways. One recent example #involved Louisiana classifying abortion pills as #ScheduleIV drugs, a category that suggested they were #dangerous or #addictive substances, contrary to #medical evidence.

#law #ReproductiveRights #FDA #medicine #medical #health #WomensHealth

Prof Melissa Murray:

“This decision preserves access to medication abortion... FOR NOW.

“There will be another case--with better plaintiffs--before the Court faster than Thomas can book a ride on Crow's private jet.”

- yep

#SCOTUS #law #ReproductiveRights #FDA #medicine #medical #health #WomensHealth #MaleSupremacy #ChristianEvangelism #NewApostolicReformation #NAR #ActivistCourt

More Prof Melissa Murray - 🧵

In the #ClarenceThomas concurrence in #FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine #AHM …, Thomas takes aim at the Court's #ThirdParty /associational #standing doctrine.

What is this doctrine?

Generally, a party in fed court can only assert his or her OWN rights & cannot raise claims about the rights of 3d parties who are not before the court.

Murray🧵1/
#SCOTUS #law #ReproductiveRights #WomensHealth #MaleSupremacy #Evangelism #NewApostolicReformation #ActivistCourt

In certain circumstances, the Court's #ThirdParty #standing doctrine allows a plaintiff to file a lawsuit or assert a defense in which the rights of 3rd parties are asserted.

This is also the case for associations/orgs, who are permitted to bring claims on behalf of members. There are lots of exceptions.

The origins of the doctrine can be traced to NAACP V. Alabama, 1958

AL was trying to get NAACP to stop work in the state — e.g. the Montgomery bus boycotts, etc.

Murray🧵2/
#law #SCOTUS

In 1956, the AL AG brought a suit against the NAACP for violating a state statute requiring foreign corporations to qualify before doing business in the state. NAACP argued that it was exempt.

The trial court issued an order preventing the
NAACP from doing business in the state--like organizing boycotts, trying to enroll students in segregated state universities, organizing voter registration drives for Black voters... basic challenging Jim Crow stuff.

Murray🧵3/
#law #SCOTUS #ThirdParty

But in addition, it also subpoenaed the NAACP's Alabama membership lists--which would have exposed members to serious reprisals, including real violence against them, their families, & their communities.

The NAACP sued to prevent the public disclosure of the membership rolls & the case made it to #SCOTUS.

SCOTUS ruled in favor of the NAACP, holding that AL's demand for the membership lists violated the right of #DueProcess guaranteed by the #14thAmendment.

Murray🧵4/
#law #SCOTUS #ThirdParty

That decision is widely credited with sowing the seeds for #ThirdParty/associational #standing--the idea that an association can present claims on behalf of its members.

This doctrine has been huge for #CivilRights. In the context of #JimCrow Alabama, few Black people would have risked challenging segregation in court--the consequences would have been swift & devastating. Instead, the NAACP could pursue claims on behalf of its members.

Murray🧵5/
#law #SCOTUS #ActivistCourt

Similar dynamics are at work in #abortion #litigation.

Many patients are loathe to challenge #abortion #laws--because of the fear of reprisals, violence, or being ostracized in a small community. These fears have a #deterrent effect on rights litigation.

Which is why #ThirdParty #standing has been so important. Most of the abortion cases that have been litigated in federal courts have been brought by providers on behalf of themselves & their patients.

Murray🧵6/
#law #SCOTUS #ActivistCourt

🚨Justice #ClarenceThomas knows that disrupting the #ThirdParty/associational #standing doctrine would have huge consequences for #abortion challenges... & indeed, any #CivilRights challenge. The costs of going public might deter someone from raising a challenge to a problematic #law.

& can be super-effective for preventing lawsuits & keeping problematic #laws on the books.

Murray🧵7/7
#SCOTUS #law #ReproductiveRights #medicine #WomensHealth #MaleSupremacy #NewApostolicReformation #ActivistCourt

@Nonilex I fear environmental & climate issues may take a hit as well
@Nonilex Which is exactly his point
@Nonilex Not to get too conspiracy-minded, but this decision allows the conservatives on the SC to punt on the issue prior to the upcoming election, without making a final decision on the substance until *after* the election with different plaintiffs. It’s kinda brilliantly evil.

@Nonilex

"Do no harm (unless God tells me to, then have at it).

@Nonilex and *this* ^my dears is why legislation is necessary.
@Nonilex Eh, what 'rights of their patients' (of doctors who oppose abortion)? The right not to have an abortion? They already have that right.
@Nonilex Don't think so. District Court judges are now solidly bound to standing precedent. They are extremely unlikely to disregard it because of a wacky concurrence that itself acknowledges the existence of that standing precedent--and because existing standing doctrine keeps their caseloads down. That means a paucity of such wacky cases going up to the CoA--where they'd almost surely have to float past an en banc panel to a demonstratedly resistant Supreme Court. So....no.
@Nonilex
Conservatives don't let go by a single opportunity to strike down at those they oppress.
@Nonilex I’m pondering what impact this might have on class action lawsuits. They are kind of similar in that an entity called a class is a third party abstraction. Corporations are also third party abstractions representing a collective. Both of these constructs assume membership in a class until affected individuals opt out. The significant difference is that in a class, the individual members can potentially be known. Not really an insurmountable difference though…public records