One thing I like about the decision in #LKQvGM is that it provides a good example of "how close is too close" in design patent law.
The court says these products are not close enough to anticipate. That means they would not, if later, be close enough to infringe.
http://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/21-2348.OPINION.5-21-2024_2321050.pdf
