A lot of people in the #Fediverse are saying that Threads joining is a form of "Embrace, extend, extinguish" and IMO I don't think that's the case.

There's no need for Meta to kill this network or absorb it.

ActivityPub by design favors big servers like Meta's, it also not being nomadic (like BlueSky *cough*) means that users can't easily jump ship from a server they don't like.

I already see the #FediPact posts discussing leaving notable servers like Mastodon.social and it's silly IMO.

By design this whole network was built on shaky ground and when discussion of any Bluesky style improvements came up most users flipped out.

We'll be here again and again until those improvements come, if they ever come.

Reality is Meta knows they're king already and they don't need the regular users on the Fediverse.

IMO they want the WordPress profiles.
They want the illusion of freedom for celebrities and corporations.

"Host your own Facebook Page" basically.

I also lets them duck any regulatory oversight.

Watch, I'm betting that #ActivityPub for Meta is #OpenGraph part 2.

An "open" data format they can use to get sites to integrate with their servers without signing up for an OAuth token or anything like that.

Facebook Connect used to be a big deal.
Major sites once let you comment on articles via Facebook only.

ActivityPub will let them pull that off again without the backlash of the past (no more "walled gardens").

I've already seen a few blogs that accept ActivityPub replies as comments.

Threads offering 130 million monthly active users puts Meta at the #1 spot for those comment sections now.

They could effectively ignore Mastodon, Friendica and the others and dominate by helping ActivityPub go more mainstream without making any changes or extensions to the spec.

Think about it, if ActivityPub becomes the HTML of the social web like the Mastodon community and #Fediverse as a whole dreamed of, Threads wins.

Easiest way to look at this is how terrible Meta's ActivityPub integration is right now.

Threads users can't see replies from outside of their server right now and any likes just appear as "X fediverse users" with no usernames or any profile info whatsoever displayed.

If they leave it that way it'd have no effect on the success of Threads.
They'd still win.

ActivityPub is like this by design.

It largely makes the same mistakes email made long before it which is now being held together by a patchwork of new standards.

If Meta truly cared for the pre-Threads Fediverse they could just buy up a server or two.

Hell Mastodon.cloud got sold pretty recently.

And again, leaving would be hard for those users.

@lucid00

The insecure old firmware though. Such a Shame.

That cost โœ‚๏ธing ๐Ÿ’‡โ€โ™‚๏ธ.use/bin/๐Ÿšฎ

The ๐Ÿงต usage per day measured in, minutes as a few, though has been on a decline. More user sign ups then abandonment trends ๐Ÿ“‰ may increase what l๐Ÿ‘€ks like a ๐Ÿmoth but... Actual DAU's are more in line with what the existing DAU's on the fediverse ๐Ÿ˜currently 1.5 million vs. ~1 million are at... At BlueSky๐ŸŒง๏ธ

Luckily the #fediverse will be fine .... growing like the stair stepping growth ๐Ÿ“ˆ๐Ÿ“Š like decentralized ๐Ÿ“จ ( " w00sh on iPhone ๐Ÿ”Š " ) but with the legal pressure, globally, ๐Ÿ’โ™พ๏ธโš–๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ฎ๐Ÿ‘ฎ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿš“๐Ÿš”๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš–๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€โš–๏ธโš–๏ธ๐Ÿ’โ™พ๏ธ, is in ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ„๐Ÿณ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”๏ธ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿšข๐ŸŒ‹๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ„๐Ÿ’ฅ territory, whereas the #fediverse ... Is not in that position, but, Mark* is.

* The COO DID. #QuietQuit. ๐Ÿคซ๐Ÿ“ฐ๐Ÿ‘‚

โš–๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€โš–๏ธ๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš–๏ธโš–๏ธ
๐Ÿ”ฌ
๐Ÿ”Žโ™พ๏ธ#MetaLeadershipโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”

๐Ÿ’โ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€โš–๏ธโš–๏ธ๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš–๏ธ๐Ÿš”๐Ÿš“๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ฎ๐Ÿš”โš–๏ธ

There ISN'T a #NOYBeu for the #fediverse ยฏ\_( อกยฐ อœส– อกยฐ)_/ยฏ but the IS for โ™พ๏ธ

A #VoteWithYourLogins ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธโ˜‘๏ธ for the #Fediverse is a ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ for #Change in #advertising & #OligarchControlledPlatforms usage trends. The Eยณ type plays they did with XMPP will fail with this ๐ŸปPub scenarios. Bet ๐ŸŽฐ๐ŸŽฒ๐Ÿƒ โ˜‘๏ธ๐Ÿคซ