This means, though, that biology most certainly is not founded on mathematics in the way that physics is.
England J (2020): Why Physics Can’t Tell Us What Life Is; Available from: http://nautil.us/issue/92/frontiers/why-physics-cant-tell-us-what-life-is
#neuroscience
Why Physics Can’t Tell Us What Life Is

The origin of life can’t be explained by first principles.

Nautilus

@MolemanPeter

» However, I will argue at various points in this book that failure to attend to the differences, to disanalogies between living things and artificial devices, has been a mistake.
...
The brain of a genetically modified lab rat is no more like a computer than the brain of a wild rat, regardless of the part played by humans in the animal’s creation. «

#TheBrainAbstracted
#MazviitaChirimuuta
1 Introduction, Footnote 6
https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262378635/the-brain-abstracted/

#NeuroBook
#PhilosophyofNeuroscience

The Brain Abstracted

An exciting, new framework for interpreting the philosophical significance of neuroscience.All science needs to simplify, but when the object of research is ...

MIT Press
@teixi Have'nt read it, but I would think I agree.

@MolemanPeter

Just started reading it..

..Follows the history of interlaced and mixed paths, approaches, proceeds of: neuro, bio, cogn, comp, phylos, psycho, etc.

An incredible compendium, research effort, resourceful reference, also with cool opinionated commentary gems.

An academic book for its plentiful references, notes, cites.
But written with an educational style, clear to comprehend, and joyful to read.

Can't recall any philosopher witch such top notch writing skillsets!

@teixi On my reading list

@MolemanPeter

Meanwhile check latest Pattee:
For my top quote in post. And for the finale, before conclusion, with funny punching of physicists, of geneticists, and also of biosemiotics, for narrow thinking!

https://mastodon.social/@teixi/112074460071937750
—paper in bottom academ link

ps: I aspire ALIKE in my mid 90s!