Blue Spring v. #ScheduleA - This complaint (filed by Boies Schiller) is going in my all-time worst design patent infringement claims file:

https://www.scribd.com/document/708509893/Blue-Spring-v-Schedule-A-Complaint

Not only are the two design patent infringement claims that are actually alleged in the complaint absolutely baseless, the plaintiff (or perhaps more correctly, their attorneys) don't seem to understand the difference between a design patent and a utility patent.

#DesignPatents #PatentFedi #ConceptFallacy

This first patent is NOT a design patent.

How do I know, without even pulling up the patent?

Well, the drawing was the first clue.

Then there's the number. There are not even 2 million DPs, let alone 9 million.

But maybe the "D" was just a typo. Let's see.

No, they seriously seem to think this is a DP. (It is not.)

For actual design patents, yes, we compare the figures in the patent to the accused products.

That is NOT the test for utility patent infringement.

This is really basic stuff.

For anyone who is interested in the details of the two infringement tests, check out our free patent casebook: https://patentlawcasebook.com/
Patent Law: An Open-Access Casebook

And as you all know, § 289 damages are only available for certain acts of design patent infringement. They are not available for any acts of utility patent infringement.

#ImproperDisgorgementDemands

Anyway, here are the pictures in the complaint that show the asserted DP and two accused product. Neither of these products infringe this design patent.

And it's not even close.

#ConceptFallacy

But the judge will probably grant a TRO and freeze these defendants' assets. Because that's just what happens in these cases.
And there's #CounterfeitRhetoric here, too. (As far as I can tell from the public screen shots, neither accused listing uses the asserted FUN FINS mark.)
Ugh, this one is so bad. It might need to go in the next draft of my paper: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4549909
Looking at all the asserted copyright registrations, which differ significantly from each other and differ extremely from the patented design, I also have lots of questions about the purported basis for #joinder here.
@design_law wow a capitalist's wet dream of grabbing assets ...and to be enforced by untrained overworked border patrol. Sheesh.

@design_law

A reminder: Boies Schiller is the same law firm that represented "SCO" (who were NOT even the original SCO they implied they were!) in their ludicrous, vexatious, failed money grab against IBM over the rights to Linux. Their briefs in that case were a marvel of incoherence, fallacious reasoning, false premises, and "Look! A monkey!" switcheroos.

Their slimy tactics included submitting discovery of source code as reams of hardcopy fanfold, and a deliberately hard-to-search computer.

(Surely their briefs in that case must be taught in law schools as an example of what never to do?)

So I, for one, am utterly unsurprised to se their name associated with lunatic litigation.

To paraphrase Monty Python and The Holy Grail, I fart in their general direction!

@design_law this is just embarrassing levels of lawyering for Boies Schiller, which can certainly afford to do better
IP Litigator Brings International Anti-Counterfeit Practice to Boies Schiller Flexner

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP today announced that Katie Kavanaugh, who is a registered foreign legal consultant with the State Bar of California, has joined the firm’s Los Angeles office as a partner. G...

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP