#bggp4 results appear to be published (but non-publicly?), and quoth https://github.com/binarygolf/BGGP/tree/main/2023:
> Some new file types, such as self-replicating VSCode Workspaces, UEFI Applications, and rizin debugger scripts, have left us feeling hopeful about future BGGP entries.

conversely, it's left me disillusioned with the bggp institution as a whole with an underspecified challenge (which IMO, given that https://github.com/binarygolf/BGGP/blob/main/2023/shell/caioluders.sh.txt and https://github.com/binarygolf/BGGP/blob/main/2023/pdf/gaycomputers.pdf.txt are both valid, my 8-byte solution in https://101010.pl/@nabijaczleweli/110729426724733327 possibly beats the official shell winner by two bytes (and even if deemed illegal, other illegal entries are still noted but just not winners, like in AHK), and the official shell winner's output /includes/ "4" in cp -v output, but not /is/ "4", the requirement is "Print, return, or display the number 4", and not "Print, return, or display any string containing the digit 4"; if "includes" is valid then `ln -v $0` is also 8 but is another valid solution and doesn't require running in an empty directory)

and a completely unresponsive submission address that has ignored both my mails, which include the above and https://101010.pl/@nabijaczleweli/110731852709923211 (which, some may note, beats the ELF entries almost two-fold!). funnier still, the official @binarygolf account has favourited both of these posts, so..?

was i the only psycho writing a.out binaries? possibly, but I see at least 14 monoglot single-entry categories