My memory is that he was always consistent with his definition of physohistory. I don't believe that it was ever re framed in later books.
I agree that his approach was that you can no more predict the movement of an individual molecule in a gas than you can predict the actions of a single person, however I think that his galactic approach is key to understanding the system behind his projections.
Sure maybe chaos theory says that the butterfly over Beijing can start a hurricane over Havana but the broad socioeconomic factors at play would always have seen man made climate change happen.
Individual chaotic actions even taken together may not have a profound effect on the heaves and swells of mass population effects and the larger the scale the more this probably holds true.
I'll have to have a read and catch up 😃