When someone decides to make up entire bungles of horse shit in their "explanation" and "apology" ( https://archive.ph/Utaz1 ) about the weird shit they did.

I want off this fucking ride.

"Postpone to 2024"? Present at a "tier 2 conference"? My reasoning is contained directly in my blog post ( https://thephd.dev/i-am-no-longer-speaking-at-rustconf-2023#-huh ). If you're going to fucking lie about me at least try and be fucking accurate about it:

“It is also deeply confusing and ultimately insulting for them not to contact me beforehand and simply ask me if I would disclaimer my work to make it clear that they did not explicitly endorse this direction. Multiple times before the RustConf schedule and program was released, I made it obscenely clear that there was not going going to be an RFC for the work I was talking about (“Pre-RFC” is the exact wording I used when talking to individuals involved with Rust Project Leadership), that this might bias folks, and whether or not it would be okay to do this. Individuals in contact with me both inside and outside RustConf leadership made it abundantly clearly that this topic was perfectly fine. Furthermore, they had already met to discuss my work before hand, so at no point should anyone be confused about what my intentions and goals are.”
That someone would try to use game-of-telephone bullshit to make it seem like I deserved to have my keynote outright removed (which was the ACTUAL SUGGESTION given to RustConf, and they changed it to a DOWNGRADE to prevent bigger fallout from Triplett and Tolnay's CLEAR oversteps and, apparently, outright lies here!), or that I was in agreement with such a removal, when I literally took the required time to make a proper assessment of the situation and respond like an ADULT, is some WILD nonsense!

Is this a common Rust Project occurrence? Do people just do this ALL THE TIME? WHAT IS GOING ON OVER THERE?!

Edit: added some fucking alt-text because I'm so fucking annoyed at this bullshit.

This isn't even a fast moving situation! It's been over 3 months since my blog post went up! How do you fuck this up!!

WE ARE ALREADY IN A FRAYED TRUST ZONE.

WHY MAKE SHIT UP?!?!

I have pretty bad self-doubt.

I pushed through that to accept that talk, and hold my head up high. And then this motherfucker just.... makes shit up. Wholesale! I don't fucking need this, I have my own imposter syndrome to fucking deal with, and this motherfucker just MAKES SHIT UP.

The rest of it, is of course, also bullshit. Trying to conflate Yoshua's struggles as a reason to paint over my work entirely and make it seem like it wasn't ready to present is a personal shortsight of his, and him projecting his inadequacy on me is absolutely bonkers. This is the best they could put together after 3 months of this absolute nonsense?

Infuriating that Yoshua catches strays in this statement for the struggle of trying to implement something truly difficult in the Rust ecosystem, but to use it as justification to attempt to bulldoze my work?

The sheer gaslighting in that statement!

But then again, given the background, I can't expect anything less.

The other fucked up part?

Imagine putting blood sweat and tears into your event and it's just casually dismissed as a "tier 2". You know, the place where things that aren't ready like my "not supposed to be a keynote" goes.

Holy moly donut shoppe!

If I pulled even a fraction of what this person is pulling right now I would have been roasted, toasted, and dropped from everything without so much as a whisper from these folks.

But we've got different standards when it comes to others, don't we now?

@thephd

That's exactly what I hope the new Rust leadership deeply internalises. There were clearly different standards in play. It was obvious when it played out (and is still obvious).

People need to dig into why or it's just going to keep happening.

@jntrnr @thephd JT: What's your feeling, in hindsight, about not naming names three months ago when you were one of the few people who could have?

@adrienne @thephd

Unsure - there's a world where naming the individuals puts so much of the spotlight on them that the org isn't pressured to change. From my perspective, the spotlight needed to be on both the org and the individuals.

@jntrnr @thephd Okay but as it turned out, one of the individuals most responsible very nearly escaped any spotlight whatsoever?

@adrienne @jntrnr JT immediately resigned and it is was only because of them this the whole process started, otherwise it would have been me vs. the world.

JT put material weight behind their convictions; this is not the person to be aiming incisive inquiry at.

@thephd @jntrnr Fair enough. I know they immediately resigned and i praised them for that at the time! I just also strongly feel that the people who knew this name should have spoken it earlier.
@thephd @jntrnr (Edited for wrong pronoun; sorry about that!)
@thephd IMHO, these events and the statement reinforces that you absolutely made the right decision in not playing along and calling out the whole charade. To bad it came with such a high price for you personally :(

@thephd Yep. Reasons why I don't waste my time their anymore.

Rust's in-group vs. out-group standards are completely bonkers.

@thephd ah, we love The Rust Community :)
@thephd ah yes, Tier 2 conferences, run by Tier 2 people, in Tier 2 countries, presumably