Two questions for you #pkm folks and those that use #zettelkasten (-derived) methods:

In your eyes,
1.) Should permanent notes be edited once created, or should they let be and a fresh note refering to them be made instead?
2.) what differentiates a permanent note from an evergreen note?

@spinningthoughts 1) create a new one refering is better imho

2) evergreen note ?

@hyde It‘s a concept you‘ll see in the space. Andy Matuschak gets credited by some with having developed the concept.

The standout idea of an evergreen note as defined by most is that evergreen notes are to be grown over time - revisited, edited, grown with new insights - and should have very specific, suscint titles while maintaining atomicity and dense associations.

See https://notes.andymatuschak.org/Evergreen_notes

The concept is sometimes almost synonymous with "permanent note" as used by some.

Evergreen notes

Andyʼs working notes
@hyde if you want to be precise, Theo Stowell‘s article on combining PARA and ZK kicked this off, because the way he described permanent notes as being suscintly titled and thus searchable from a Dataview query kicked off an association in my mind about Andy Matuschak‘s theorem that evergreen note titles should be „API-like“ (and thus you can invoke a link to the captured concept by "just typing it out")