V Martín

@65dBnoise @tom30519 reminder of this preview paper

https://mastodon.social/@sharponlooker/110071741890574220

Imho, it's probably a combination of all sorts, but I wouldn't be surprised if we get told that impact debris would mostly have been buried by later events #IAmNotAGeologistTMBut

Jul 29, 2023 at 8:10amWeb
Show thread65dBnoiseJul 29, 2023
@sharponlooker @tom30519 \
Could deposits in e, f, c, d, which are the youngest identified in the maps, have buried those in i, h, m, l, k, i.e. the ones dated immediately after the impact? They appear to be in different areas. 🧐