Who's in here and is interested in technical discussion stuff? I realize still not as much reach as Twit^^X for communication, but that there is a more technical audience here?
@reduz I don't think there will be much audience here for the time being, but I am always happy to read the discussions 😀

@camperotactico @reduz

There was just a nice, in-depth discussion here on Mastodon on the new Intel CPU extensions and how they compare to ARM earlier today. The technical audience is most definitely around.

@reduz love technical discussions, especially the low level stuff
@reduz Depends on what you mean by discussion but if you're wanting a place to share more technical details, I'd certainly be happy to read it.
@reduz I am! Are there for example any siggraph publications which you are eying currently and want to implement?
@reduz I'm afraid I won't be able to contribute much to those discussions, but I love to see and read them.
@reduz
I love the technical discussion, but I still need to learn a lot about advanced rendering
@reduz Haha, these days I only visit Twitter to read your posts, so I will be happy to read them here as well. Or on any other platform you chose in the end. 😉
@reduz sure!
Still looking for new tech place :)
I am. Coding, game engines, 3D, Linux, open source - all that good stuff.

@reduz I am :)

The tech audience will come if we lead the way. There's already a bunch of the rendering tech sphere here who discuss stuff.

@reduz I'm not knowledgable to “discuss” tech stuff. But I'm happy to listen and learn.
@reduz Yep, love tech discussion!
@reduz Would love to follow you here. As I'm not on twitter, Mastodon and Discord are my preferred ways of following #godot #godotengine . Thanks a lot 👍

@reduz technical discussions on what? :P

I am personally mostly here for the ideological discussions, but then again, I'm also enjoying technical stuff.

But the first thing about the #Fediverse is, that you have to put in effort first for people to find you: join conversations others start, and use hashtags to draw in a relevant audience.

It will be good once you get the hang of it.

Piped

An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube frontend which is efficient by design.

@reduz not sure if I can contribute much to the discussion, but I'm definitely interested in reading. And I'm sure there's quite a crowd here that would be interested, too.
@reduz I am for sure! I would love more activity here. Even though I have a Twitter account, Twitter has, over the years, become a place for celebrities (so I rarely log in these days). Using twitter is like talking in to a dark void if you aren't famous or don't subscribe to toxic behavior. Here, on the other hand, people actually respond and have an interest in each other. Definetly my preferred choice.
@mikelundahl @reduz that's an interesting point. Mastodon seems to be more simple to interact and more focused, and looks great for building concise communities. The multiple instances model though may feel a bit confusing for beginners, which may restrict the growth of the user base.
@reduz Absolutely! I really hope you start posting here
@reduz hi, one anim engine programmer here would love to read your thoughts
@reduz I do like a good technical discussion, but I would also like more of those threads you post on Twitter. Especially now that I got rid of my account and can't read any of them there.
@reduz I deleted my Birdsite account and follow @reduzio , replies don't work though.
Technical discussion on Fediverse would be better.
@reduz I'am definitely interested by some technical stuff
@reduz only one way to find out
@reduz Here, and interested.
@reduz tech instances from my follow list, in no particular order:
- oldbytes.space | https://oldbytes.space
- techhub.social | https://techhub.social
- mastodon.acm.org | https://mastodon.acm.org
- hackers.town | https://hackers.town
- tilde.zone | https://tilde.zone
- social.kernel.org | https://social.kernel.org
- furry.engineer | https://furry.engineer
- floss.social | https://floss.social
- peoplemaking.games | https://peoplemaking.games
- infosec.exchange | https://infosec.exchange
- hachyderm.io | https://hachyderm.io
- digipres.club | https://digipres.club
- mstdn.games | https://mstdn.games
- functional.cafe | https://functional.cafe
- tech.lgbt | https://tech.lgbt
OldBytes Space - Mastodon

Full of old bytes. Please don't demagnetize the core memory, thanks. Do you like old hardware ? Do you use them ? Perfect you're welcome here !

Mastodon hosted on oldbytes.space
@reduz I'm not exactly into Godot (except the original play that I read when I was a student hehe) but I appreciate the quality of your open discussions, so, if it can happen on mastodon, so be it :)
@reduz enthusiasts and professionals alike, they'll find you here, just remember to use hashtags
@reduz same for me, 100% interested in technical discussions!
@reduz lots of nerds here, there is even a instance dedicated to gamedevs! ( Adminned by Aras )
@reduz give me all that technical goodness! 😁
@reduz I'm hoping you'll finally start posting over here, you are one of the few I'm still checking in on, on the bird site.
@reduz Computer go brrr𝕏𝕏𝕏𝕏

@reduz Alas “technical” covers cosmic areas, but I miss the usenet communities of yore, like comp.arch and comp.arch.fpga.

Always ready to discuss anything related to #microprocessorarchitecture, #microprocessorimplementation, #digitallogic, and especially “paths not followed”, like #asynclogic, #blockstructureISAs, etc

@reduz well I'm not on twitter anymore

@reduz I barely opened Twitter for the past few months, but I've been very active here and IMO after 13 years on Twitter, is that discussions here can be much more technical and deeper than Twitter.

Twitter also attracts a lot of noise and random replies, here, the answers are normally very relevant to the discussion.

And there's more technical discussions here than Twtr: (1) no algorithm, no need to write bland/clickbait threads to engage (2) longer posts (3) edit possibility

@reduz Im always interested in technical discussion even if my technical understanding of computer graphics is a little basic and somewhat outdated.