Can anyone explain what this means -- is it saying that anything I compile with this is essentially #GPL3 (because of libraries?) #ada #adacore #gnat
Apparently it's a myth that #ada can't be #GPL3 (a backwards way to word it, for sure). This seems to say that I can't use #Adacore / #GNAT Community Edition and I should use the alire toolchain instead https://ada-lang.io/docs/learn/overview/debunking-ada-myths#ada-code-does-not-have-to-be-gpl
Debunking Ada Myths | Ada Programming Language

These are written in the truthful form, rather than stating the myth.

The Ada GPL UXB is something I’m unwilling to poke any further as I can’t get the GNU #Ada compiler tool chain to be recognised in VScode for nothing (GNU software and Windows, a match made in hell), only the GNAT tool chain which is GPLv3 only without a commercial licence. I’ve opted to use Lua for now as the simplest language with the smallest cross-platform runtime to distribute (no, Python, isn’t viable). I may look at #Zig next