Greg Donald :ruby: :whyfox: (@[email protected])

Q. What do we want? A. Raku-compatible Regular Expressions (RCRE™) Q. When do we want it? A. 25 years ago? 😂 #Perl #Raku https://docs.raku.org/language/regexes

Ruby.social

@mjgardner

Why would anyone spend time on this remark, which is clearly intended as a joke?

If someone in the Ruby community wants to spend time on that, then I'm sure there will be people in the Raku community willing to help. But not before then.

@lizmat I didn’t take it as a joke. I guess you see it as a dig at #Perl6’s long gestation?

I think an “RCRE” library would be cool. #RakuLang rules and grammars are excellent.

I believe it’s more productive to cheerfully disregard haters and, if possible, redirect the topic to advance a positive message to a friendly audience.

#Trolls hate that. 😁

@mjgardner I love Raku. I can also take a joke.

@profoundlynerdy Me too, but I also think it’s a good idea apart from the slightly inaccurate dig.

(OP was a few days early from commemorating the 23rd anniversary of Jon Orwant’s mug-throwing, and a couple months early from the 25th anniversary of Chip Salzenberg’s aborted attempt to rewrite #Perl internals in C++)

@mjgardner I knew it was only a matter of time before other languages ripped off that feature from #Raku. But the better I get to know Raku the clearer it is to me that it's far from a one-trick pony.

It's very malleable and it's getting *faster*.

@profoundlynerdy I don’t think other languages *have* “ripped off” #RakuLang #regexes and grammars. The point of a notional “RCRE” library would be to enable that.
@mjgardner Right, I mean it's the most likely feature to get copied at least in the short term.