This is from the Better Way Conference, the actual panel that Andrew Bridgen spoke as part of. Wonder if Andrew agrees with Mark that the traitors to humanity work for “Sage & Tavistock”, and that THEY released rock and roll in the 50’s to destroy society.
Totally normal for a sitting politician to share a stage with someone who thinks Hollywood elites planned Covid, 9/11 and climate change. And taunted us about it in an obscure tv show in 2005.
Here's the reception Bridgen got at that conference:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/26nuTD0pJswu/
The session was introduced by Tess Lawrie with the claim “make no mistake, mind control is being escalated with the increasing deployment of 5G and AI” and “A globalist cabal have been voicing their plans for humankind in plain sight for decades”.
She said she is there to represent every grandmother whose grandchildren no longer listen to their wisdom. No word as to whether she yelled at clouds.
Elsewhere on the same panel as Andrew Bridgen was noted conspiracy theorist Dolores Cahill. She was there to talk about the law. She is not a lawyer.
She explained that we have five fundamental freedoms - freedom for life, travel, speech, privacy and property - and that these have been consistent freedoms for all people of the world, for tens of thousands of years. Think of a time when people had no freedom of privacy, speech or travel? Yeah, apparently that didn't exist.
Below that, there natural law - which is simply “act in honour and do no harm”. That applies to men, women, people, and things that are alive, which I guess means animals are bound over to do no harm and act with honour. I'll remind my cat of that, the next time she pees behind the TV.
Below natural law, Cahill says, is the legal system, which only applies to things that are not alive. The legal system only applies to a business, “legal entity”, “corporation”, or dead body
Andrew Bridgen's speech is remarkably bland, by comparison. He has 10 minutes. The first 30s is a standing ovation. The next 4 minutes is spent talking up how successful he was at winning local elections, and how he made his constituency so much happier and richer.
Then he gives definitions of the words "freedom" and "democracy". We are half way through his allotted time by this point.
It's strong "didn't read the book, still got to give the book review in class" energy.
6 mins into his 10, he gets to Covid: in parliament they won't allow him a debate on vaccine harms, or the origins of the virus, or excess deaths.
They won't debate you on it, Andrew, because you mis-cite the facts!
"People blame Tories for excess deaths, but when I try to get Labour MPs to talk about it, and they won’t talk about it either, there’s something seriously wrong with democracy."
Namely that people with as little grasp on the facts as Bridgen get into office
Andrew Bridgen's "top priorities"
1) Digital ID, which will be sold to corporations
2) Digital currency, which will come in in Autumn after the banking collapse
3) End of cash
4) Low traffic neighbourhoods, which are designed to curtail your freedom
5) The WHO pandemic treaty, which is actually a dictatorship
Think of that as your top five worst things happening right now. That's the world these folk inhabit.
Bridgen: "When I was thrown out of the Tories for speaking on vaccines, not one Tory colleague called to commiserate with me.
The only politician who called, and he rang within of my expulsion… was Robert Kennedy Jr"
<cue huge round of applause>
These guys REALLY love RFKjr
immediately after Bridgen is another sovereign citizen speaker, Karen-Ruth Skolmli, who shares this slide on law and jurisdiction.
She explains that all legislation is either unnecessary or unlawful. If it aligns with natural law, it is unnecessary; if it goes against natural law, then it’s unlawful anyway.
I mean, this woman is full-scale Sov-Cit.
In order for government to apply legislation to us, it has to make us creations of the state, then it has authority over us, and control over us.
They trap us into contract by making us register birth, marriage, houses, land, cars, taxes, healthcare, all so they can trap us into a contracts and therefore have authority over us.
We become our job title, when we should be operating as sovereign man and woman, under only natural law.
"This is slavery," she tells the audience of middle class elderly people wealthy enough to pay £500+ to attend a conference in Bath hosted by the guy who used to do coastal history programs on the BBC, "and we are all living as slaves"
The audience applauds, righteously.
I've figured it out"
They're saying "in-a-lien-able", as in "not able have a 'lien' taken away".
Because they believe that when you're born, your birth certificate puts aside a security grant against your personhood (eg a lien), which they think over-rides your basic rights if you let it, but because those rights cannot be over-ridden this way, they are in-a-lien-able.
Now I want to start a movement of in-Jolene-able rights.
I'm begging of you, please don't take my rights. Please don't take them just because you can...
OK, I'm into the Q&A, finally, and once again, it's a total farce. I mean, the panel is so large that they don't all fit in shot. 11 people!
I've had to draw in half of one person, and then Tess Lawrie on the far end.
Plus Neil Oliver is sat behind the guy who is stood up. It's not clear why, because he hasn't been involved in this session, but I GUARANTEE he will answer at least one question.
I've remembered to alt-tag the image this time, too.
First question: how do you get young people to listen to this information?
Probably by not holding it at a £500-a-ticket ego-stroking festival in bath, featuring a ten minute self-aggrandizing speech from a disgraced politician?
The Q&A is a bust, nothing of real interest:
- A guy who is trying to get the International Criminal Court to prosecute the 9 people who created SARS-CoV-2.
- Dolores saying she is going to try politicians by jury and imprison them for 20 years.
- Karen mentions she's actually facing a spot of legal bother at the moment.
- Bridgen says democracy is dead.
Interestingly Neil Oliver ends by saying he understood and agreed with ever speaker, so I guess he's full Sovereign Citizen now?
Interestingly, in wrapping up, Neil Oliver says "when you hear something that's true, you don't have to process it, it has a physiological effect, you can just feel it inside you".
Which is interesting, because I was told the same thing when I interviewed Matt Le Tissier, and I talked about exactly that idea when I recently appeared on BBC Radio 3'd "Free Thinking"!
Michael Marshall
mem_somerville
Rob
diessoli