#LorieSmith, the woman who said being forced to create a "Gay Wedding" website was a violation of her #FirstAmendment rights, was NEVER ACTUALLY ASKED to build a Gay Wedding website. NO ONE ACTUALLY SUED HER, and the couple she cited in her case was actually a STRAIGHT married couple.
This was a *total* "WHAT IF" case and NOT the #SCotUS settling a dispute. They were CREATING LAW by even taking up the case... which is the purview of Congress, not the Court. 🤬 The most #ActivistCourt in history.
A reporter decided to track down the "customer" named in #LorieSmith's anti-gay wedding website case that went to the #SCotUS to get his thoughts on the subject.
The man... married to a woman and had a child... was also a website designer and didn't know why he was being cited in her case... questioned why he... a website designer himself... would ask another website designer in another state who had never made a gay-wedding website, to make one for him? 🤨 https://www.msnbc.com/alex-wagner-tonight/watch/report-suggests-supreme-court-opened-door-to-anti-gay-discrimination-based-on-fake-case-186270789569
Melissa Gira Grant, staff writer for The New Republic, talks about her interview with the person supposedly at the heart of the 303 Creative v. Elenis case and her reporting that suggests there is no basis in reality for the case that has become the vehicle for the conservative Supreme Court to allow discrimination against LGBTQ people.
MugsysRapSheet Blog ☑️