Re: https://github.com/leahneukirchen/sq
What problem does #urvxt have with boldfacing?
I'm curious, because the usual strategy (although I haven't checked what urxvt does) is overwrite with the glyph shifted by 1 pixel, which isn't going to work well universally.
Is it that?
That looks like #urxvt is picking up a different glyph set entirely. I don't see how any kind of shift+or transformation could turn the upper '%' (unbolded) into the lower one.
It looks like it's nothing that I need worry about, anyway. My programs do the shift-1-pixel thing too.
JdeBP
Leah Neukirchen