#Google's #AIHype Circle: We have to do #Bard because everyone else is doing #AI; everyone else is doing AI because we're doing Bard.
https://doctorow.medium.com/googles-ai-hype-circle-6158804d1299
#Google's #AIHype Circle: We have to do #Bard because everyone else is doing #AI; everyone else is doing AI because we're doing Bard.
https://doctorow.medium.com/googles-ai-hype-circle-6158804d1299
Google's plummeting search quality made the company desperate to please its "activist investors"
https://doctorow.medium.com/googles-ai-hype-circle-6158804d1299
#SecurityThroughObscurity #SearchQuality #Enshittification #Google
Google can improve search, or it can chase stock gains through #AIHype. It chose the latter
https://doctorow.medium.com/googles-ai-hype-circle-6158804d1299
We saw this movie before. Remember the 3,000,000 truckers who were about to lose their jobs to #SelfDriving tech?
https://doctorow.medium.com/googles-ai-hype-circle-6158804d1299
Executives ALREADY treat writers like #chatbots.
https://doctorow.medium.com/googles-ai-hype-circle-6158804d1299
@johnmullinax @pluralistic @Magneto
So, a South Park episode, then?
@pluralistic Apparently execs *think of* writers like chatbots, too. They seem to have no concept of "art", "entertainment", or "information", only of weird squiggles and pictures that inexplicably cause products to sell. If this article is any indication and can be applied more broadly than comic books, execs would just stream static if they could.
https://adeptpress.wordpress.com/2015/03/19/at-corporate-they-just-sell-paper/
@pluralistic Goodness, anything to avoid saying "trains are better".
They also need none of that flakey "AI" nonsense.
@pluralistic why would Google improve search? There is no need. Google is the only Search engine in the universe, there never was another and there will never be.
From the 10 commandments: Thou shall have no other search engine.
NOW WITH MORE BLOCKCHAIN!!
For real, I've changed all my defaults for the first time in decades. I can't say the alternatives are better-- but, they aren't exactly worse.
Google's search is a disaster.
@futurebird Unfortunately, to my knowledge there are only 2 US search engines that do their own indexing now: Bing and Google. Every other "competitor" just buys their results from Bing and Google.
Just like there are only two real browsers now: Chrome(ium) and Firefox. Everything else is just a Chromium variant. Unless you want to run Konqueror or something, but I imagine the browsing experience will be greatly degraded.
@pluralistic I'm old enough to remember that there was a time when all websites were trying to keep you on their website and Google seemed revolutionary because they were busy trying to get you off their website every time you visited. Indeed they were anal about it taking as little time as possible from the time you got there to the time you left.
Then at some point they sold their souls to try and keep people on their website for as long as possible. It was all lost then.
@ai6yr Exactly my experience. Little difference with the others I dabble in - Bing (duh), duck duck, etc.
They're not interested in returning results, they want money. I wish there was a way around all of that.
I think the time has come and the market may now exist for "bespoke search" basically search as a paid service. Let me list the things you ought to index and generally show me. Give me a full text or at least keyword search for the things I care about-- supplement with other information only when that fails.
Make the words: AND OR NOT mean something again for crying out loud.
The search feature on twitter *was* excellent and one of the things that kept me there for some time.
I learnt a thing about cooking thanks to @pluralistic and a massive Google #ai fail.