Absolute nightmare of an experience at Brussels airport passport control. Likely getting profiled because the birthplace on my French passport says Turkey and the chip isn’t working (which is why I was in the manual control lane to begin with).
The joys of being white passing in racist countries. You’re fine until they see you might be a bit too Brown inside.
Now sitting in a room with other Brown and Black folks, waiting (and they have my passport).
Just spoke with two women being held in the same room as me. Also of Turkish ethnicity, both Belgian citizens. Not being allowed into Belgium.
Brussels airport is racially profiling EU Citizens.
Please share widely.
Cue my white-presenting privilege and a predictably apologetic supervisor, taking me out of the room with a look of “oh, goodness, you don’t belong in there” (first experienced while entering the US, many years ago) Explained I was unlucky a plane had landed from Turkey and they saw “Ankara” as my birth place. Told him this is racial profiling and about the two young women. Promised to look into it.
Also told him “I hope you realise how horrible this feels.”
@aral Probably the person had this scenery in their mind when they read ankara
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfilaKrnAhQ
@aral Whelp, what a way to end Offdem :(
Reality hitting hard...
@aral It is published!
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Pieter%20Vander%20Vennet/diary/400909
Ethnic profiling happened (happens?) in The Netherlands as well, but a district court allowed it. See the judgment below (obviously in Dutch, so might want to auto-translate). Kmar = Dutch border control by military police.
https://deeplink.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2021:10283
It appears @amnestynl has appealed the case in a class action lawsuit (WAMCA):
https://deeplink.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2022:1316
UPDATE: appeal court overruled primary court
@aral Sorry to hear about your experience. Have you considered filing a complaint? Hope the two women are allright..
@lightspeed The Dutch border police is still racially profiling people. Amnesty has appealed, the court will decide on 14 Feb. (However, it's not a class action/WAMCA, the two citizens who have brought the case to court together with Amnesty and other orgs don't claim damages, all they want is a prohibition on racial profiling.)
@gwenvaneijk Hey, Gwen, I’m happy to file a complaint. Do you know where would be most effective to do so? (And thank you.) :)
PS. I hope so too.
(Technical reply back to @gwenvaneijk: despite it's name the WAMCA covers all class action procedures, wether damage is claimed or not. It's a cover-all act for collective procedures that combines the possibilities to claim e.g. a declaration of right and *can* include damages. See the appeal judgment I cited and second bullet point under 2 on page 1 of the explanatory memorandum that accompanied the WAMCA).
@lightspeed Ah yes I see now, I hadn't looked into the specifics of the new law yet, as collective claims for declaratory and/or injunctive relief were already possible, my mistake. Just wanted to stress that the Amnesty case is not about monetary damages. Thanks for clarifying!
As if the court knew I mentioned the case, the appeal court just published a press statement that they will publish their judgment next week on February 14th. Those who are interested (and understand Dutch) can watch a livestream.
Den Haag, 07 februari 2023 Het gerechtshof Den Haag doet op dinsdag 14 februari a.s. uitspraak in een zaak die is aangespannen tegen de Nederlandse Staat over etnisch profileren van de Koninklijke Marechaussee.
Congratulations Gwen! The appeal court apparently overruled the primary court and decided the Koninklijke Marechaussee is guilty of ethnic profiling.
The Koninklijke Marechaussee is guilty of ethnic profiling, the Court of Appeals in The Hague ruled on Tuesday. The policing service can not check people based on external characteristics such as their skin color. “This is a serious form of discrimination,” the appeals court ruled, NU.nl reports.
By the way: the state secretary of justice just confirmed in parliament that the Dutch cabinet did not request the Kmar to stop using the profiles that contain ethnicity, because the state secretary answered to parliamentary questions the Kmar will be requested to stop using ethnicity as a result of the judgment today.
Which obviously means they weren't asked to stop using ethnicity up until now.
Even more intriguing is point 7.1.1 in the judgment. The Kmar never stopped after the judgment in 2021 according to the appeal court:
https://deeplink.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2023:173
Ter info: de minister van rechtsbescherming is het niet eens met de motie Stoffer die recent de regering opriep om de representativiteit van de eisers met een WAMCA vordering te onderzoeken (in het kader van Urgenda etc.).
De minister noemt in de Kamerbrief vandaag dat de toets op representativiteit al indringend is. Wellicht nuttig om te weten. Een standaard verweer van de landsadvocaat lijkt namelijk gebrek aan representativiteit.
Minister Weerwind (Rechtsbescherming) reageert op de motie van het Tweede Kamerlid Stoffer (SGP) en anderen. De motie verzoekt de regering om de mogelijkheden te verkennen van het stellen van nadere vereisten voor belangenorganisaties met een ideëel doelmet het oog op de representativiteit.
Sorry dat ik steeds opnieuw begin over het Kmar vonnis en arrest (en misschien lees ik er overheen), maar ik bedacht net dat het eigenlijk wel raar is dat de rechtbank en het gerechtshof niet artikel 10 lid 1 en 2 Algemene wet gelijke behandeling hebben betrokken in de uitspraken:
https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0006502/2020-01-01/0/Hoofdstuk1/Paragraaf5/Artikel10/afdrukken
Het oordeel was waarschijnlijk niet anders geweest, maar de standaard bewijslastverdeling kan omdraaien indien er voldoende wordt gesteld.
Breng ‘eenzijdig overheidshandelen’ onder de Algemene wet gelijke behandeling. Dat adviseren de Nationaal Coördinator tegen Discriminatie en Racisme (NCDR), het College voor de Rechten van de Mens en de Staatscommissie tegen discriminatie en racisme aan minister Bruins Slot van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties. Daardoor kunnen burgers betere rechtsbescherming krijgen als zij zich door de overheid gediscrimineerd voelen.
Dank je wel, weer wat geleerd. Zoals je begrijpt sluit ik me aan bij het College en de NCDR. De argumentatie in de parlementaire geschiedenis is ook niet erg overtuigend anno 2023:
"(...) onderbrenging van dit handelen onder de werkingssfeer van de Awgb niet noodzakelijk is omdat de overheid gehouden is artikel 1 Grondwet na te leven."
'That didn't age well' zou ik zeggen.
Kamerstukken II 2002/03, 28770, nr. 5, p. 29
https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/kst-28770-5.html#:~:text=Voor%20zover%20de,te%20leven.%20
@MisterWanko I’m a French citizen. The two you women at Belgian citizens. Unless Belgium has a political problem with Belgium and France, it’s racial.
I didn’t think this would require clarification.
Could be intel of a poss threat coming from or through Turkey - they don’t normally make that info public
Aral Balkan
Dee Toher
Niléane
Roomey
hilaryjohn
Izzy
🐦🔥nemo™🐦⬛ 🇺🇦🍉
Jigme Datse
Pietervdvn 
Xerz 💗
PJ "Vote Green" Coffey
Stefano Minguzzi
lightspeed
Gwen van Eijk
Jarvis Slacks
Christian Grobmeier
Stevens R Miller
SabrinaDent
driesverlinden
Joachim
Gareth Kitchen
Mister Wanko
JAFO