Attached: 1 image Twitter has now updated its TOS to support the banning of accounts like elonjet by making it against the rules to reveal someone's "actual physical location, or other identifying information that would reveal a person's location". It is now against TOS to tweet about a live press conference in the Rose Garden.
@dappergander @JxckS This is incorrect. It wouldn’t be violating the policy because it “contains eyewitness accounts or on the ground reports from developing events” and the players are public figures.
Source: https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-information
@kcivey @ifvictr @dappergander @JxckS They took the rules out of context and cropped out additional terms above it.
This whole rule change/addition is absolutely absurd and why I'm going to use Mastodon more often now. Bird app don't consider a "name" to be private information... really? It's the first example of private info on a number of sites.
@MelloProto @Teufelwolf666 @kcivey @ifvictr @dappergander @JxckS
The jet also has a cruising speed of 956 km/h so how would he be posting "live" location data? By the time it was reported by the twitter account the jet would've travelled a significant distance, unless it was stationary and if it was stationary Musk wouldn't be on it?
@MelloProto @Teufelwolf666 @kcivey @ifvictr @dappergander @JxckS
IMO it's a totally disingenuous argument by Musk and his sycophants that the car incident is in any way relevant to stopping the plane tracking. I even saw 1 go as far as claiming that the 2A justifies it because he's protecting himself
These people aren't all there
@ifvictr @MelloProto @Teufelwolf666 @kcivey @dappergander @JxckS I don't think Musk was even in the car, he said the guy was following the car with his kid in "thinking it was [him]"
So don't report on where (person A) is in case someone follows (person B)?