Elon gave me no warning.... plus he suspended all of my accounts, half of which track aircraft (NASA aircraft, experimental aircraft, weather, airforce etc). not people including my personal
@JxckS and to justify it, they changed the rules in such a way that it's now against TOS to livetweet about the World Cup
https://journa.host/@dappergander/109514361474279646
Feminist Proper Gander (@dappergander@journa.host)

Attached: 1 image Twitter has now updated its TOS to support the banning of accounts like elonjet by making it against the rules to reveal someone's "actual physical location, or other identifying information that would reveal a person's location". It is now against TOS to tweet about a live press conference in the Rose Garden.

Mastodon

@dappergander @JxckS This is incorrect. It wouldn’t be violating the policy because it “contains eyewitness accounts or on the ground reports from developing events” and the players are public figures.

Source: https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-information

X's private information policy and doxxing | X Help

Learn about how X handles unauthorized posting of private information, also known as doxxing, and how to report it.

@ifvictr @dappergander @JxckS That says "For media" though. If it's text that wouldn't apply apparently. And if it did then the Elon Jet account wouldn't be in violation because Musk is a public figure.

@kcivey @ifvictr @dappergander @JxckS They took the rules out of context and cropped out additional terms above it.

This whole rule change/addition is absolutely absurd and why I'm going to use Mastodon more often now. Bird app don't consider a "name" to be private information... really? It's the first example of private info on a number of sites.

@MelloProto @kcivey @ifvictr @dappergander @JxckS
Elon's jet is always located at "commercial property' (airports) and airspace is mostly not private.
@Teufelwolf666 @kcivey @ifvictr @dappergander @JxckS imo, the ElonJet Twitter profile wasn't even violating the new terms of service. Elon may not necessarily be on the jet, it's public information, and the account wasn't posting the info with the intent to make anyone else harass or anything.

@MelloProto @Teufelwolf666 @kcivey @ifvictr @dappergander @JxckS

The jet also has a cruising speed of 956 km/h so how would he be posting "live" location data? By the time it was reported by the twitter account the jet would've travelled a significant distance, unless it was stationary and if it was stationary Musk wouldn't be on it?

@graphite_notes @Teufelwolf666 @kcivey @ifvictr @dappergander @JxckS Yeah and even after landing, there must be a way to have security so that you’re safe, from leaving the plane to traveling in a car. Do we even know if the guy used the info on the Twitter account to stalk Elon? Removing the account doesn’t solve the problem. People can just use the tracking site, anyway.

@MelloProto @Teufelwolf666 @kcivey @ifvictr @dappergander @JxckS

IMO it's a totally disingenuous argument by Musk and his sycophants that the car incident is in any way relevant to stopping the plane tracking. I even saw 1 go as far as claiming that the 2A justifies it because he's protecting himself

These people aren't all there

@graphite_notes @MelloProto @Teufelwolf666 @kcivey @dappergander @JxckS It’d make more sense if there’s confirmation the guy found the car because he knew when and where to intercept Elon when he landed (both of which the bot gave info for)

@ifvictr @MelloProto @Teufelwolf666 @kcivey @dappergander @JxckS I don't think Musk was even in the car, he said the guy was following the car with his kid in "thinking it was [him]"

So don't report on where (person A) is in case someone follows (person B)?

@graphite_notes Wait, it’s not clear what you’re trying to say in the second paragraph. Mind clarifying?
@ifvictr the guy didn't give info on where and when to intercept Musk, because it wasn't Musk he intercepted